N/A N=63 Randomized Treatment

Comparing Synthetic Bone Alone Versus Synthetic Bone With Bone Marrow in Bone Lesions

Bone Diseases

Bottom Line

View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00147823 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

0.0%

Results posted

Jun 2015

Primary outcome: Primary: Resorption of Graft Material (GR) Compared at 24 Months — 51; 47 percentage of resorption — p=<0.01

Study Design & Population

Study type: Interventional
Phase: N/A
Interventions: Vitoss Alone (Device); Vitoss with Bone Marrow Aspirate (Device)
Age: Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex: All
Sponsor: State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
Primary completion: Dec 2011

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Resorption of Graft Material (GR) Compared at 24 Months	51; 47	<0.01 sig

Summary

This is a prospective randomized study comparing Vitoss alone versus Vitoss with bone marrow aspirate in benign bone lesions.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with a benign bone lesion requiring surgical curettage

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with infection, bone marrow disorders, or other contraindications to use of supplemental bone marrow aspiration as well as those who prefer autologous or allogeneic graft material alone (without synthetic filler) would be excluded.

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00147823). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.