Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=19 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Use of Cidofovir for Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis

Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00205374 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
19
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Change in Papilloma Severity — 13.2; 12; 3.7; 3.6 scores on a scale
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
111citations · ~6 / year
Cidofovir efficacy in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2008 · High-confidence link

Summary

Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is the most common benign neoplasm of the larynx in the pediatric population. The impact of the disease on patients and families can be tremendous due to the need for frequent treatment. It would be highly beneficial to develop effective medical therapies as adjunctive measures to surgical ablation with the goal of reducing the frequency of reoccurrence.

Linked Publications

  • Cidofovir efficacy in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2008 · 111 citations · High-confidence link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Papilloma Severity
13.2; 12; 3.7; 3.6; 2.7; 5.1
SECONDARY
12-month Change in Voice Handicap Index (VHI) Score
22; 32; 31; 42

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 4 surgeries for RRP in last 12 months

Exclusion Criteria

  • Renal insufficiency
  • Nephrotoxic drugs in the last 7 days
  • Sulfa allergies
  • Currently treated with systemic or topical HPV chemotherapeutic agents
  • Females of childbearing potential with a positive pregnancy test
  • Women who are breast feeding
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00205374) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search