Phase 3
N=547
Efficacy Study of Pioglitazone Compared to Glimepiride on Coronary Atherosclerotic Disease Progression in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00225277 ↗Enrolled (actual)
547
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Jun 2009
Primary outcome: Primary: Nominal Change From Baseline in Percent Atheroma Volume — 40.592; 40.016; -0.161; 0.725 Percent volume — p=0.002
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Interventions
- Pioglitazone (Drug); Glimepiride (Drug)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 35+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Takeda
- Primary completion
- Oct 2007
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Nominal Change From Baseline in Percent Atheroma Volume |
40.592; 40.016; -0.161; 0.725 | 0.002 sig |
| SECONDARY Nominal Change From Baseline in Normalized Total Atheroma Volume |
206.579; 217.619; -5.528; -1.480 | 0.064 |
| SECONDARY Number of Subjects Experiencing Any of the Composite Endpoint A Cardiovascular Events |
5; 6 | 0.744 |
| SECONDARY Number of Subjects Experiencing Any of the Composite Endpoint B Cardiovascular Events |
40; 41 | 0.883 |
| SECONDARY Number of Subjects Experiencing Any of the Composite Endpoint C Cardiovascular Events |
11; 13 | 0.663 |
Summary
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of pioglitazone, once daily (QD), compared to glimepiride on atherosclerotic disease measured by intravascular ultrasound.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Females of childbearing potential who were sexually active agreed to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
- Had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Have received appropriate counseling on lifestyle modification for type 2 diabetes, including diet and exercise.
- naïve to or was not currently taking antidiabetic therapy, or were currently treated with monotherapy or combination therapy.
- Had a glycosylated hemoglobin level greater than or equal to 6.0% and less than 9% at screening if taking antidiabetic medication or greater than or equal to 6.5% and less than 10% at screening if naive to or not taking antidiabetic medication.
- Angiographic criteria:
- Entire Coronary Circulation: must have angiographic evidence of coronary heart disease as defined by at least 1 lesion in a native coronary artery that has greater than or equal to 20% reduction in lumen diameter by angiographic visual estimation.
- Left Main Coronary Artery: must not have greater than 50% reduction in lumen diameter by visual angiographic estimation.
- Target Coronary Artery:
- The target vessel, which includes the main artery and all of its side branches, had not undergone prior percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
- The target vessel, which includes the main artery and all of its side branches, was not currently a candidate for intervention or a likely candidate for intervention over the next 72 weeks.
- The target vessel was not a bypass graft.
- The target vessel was not infarct related.
- Had previous coronary artery bypass surgery at least six weeks prior to the qualifying intravascular ultrasound are eligible provided they are stable and meet all other entry criteria.
- Had an intravascular ultrasound tape deemed to be of acceptable intravascular ultrasound image quality and demonstrated adherence to the intravascular ultrasound interrogation protocol, as determined by the intravascular ultrasound Core Laboratory™ assessment.
Exclusion Criteria
- Had type I diabetes mellitus.
- Had participated in another investigational study, or participated in an investigational study 30 days prior to the start of this study, or who were scheduled to participate in an investigational study during the time frame of this study.
- Male subjects who had a serum creatinine level greater than or equal to 2.0 mg/dL (greater than or equal to 177 µmol/L) (greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL; [greater than or equal to 133 µmol /L] if taking metformin) and female subjects who have serum creatinine greater than or equal to 1.8 mg/dL [greater than or equal to 159 µmol /L] (greater than or equal to 1.4 mg/dL [greater than or equal to 124 µmol /L] if taking metformin).
- Had unexplained microscopic hematuria greater than +1, confirmed by repeat testing.
- Had a history of drug abuse or a history of alcohol abuse (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than 4 alcoholic drinks per day) within the past 2 years.
- Had clinical cardiac failure as defined by New York Heart Association class III or IV, or known left ventricular dysfunction measured as left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%, or by current use of diuretics or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors for treatment of heart failure.
- Had an alanine transaminase level of greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal active liver disease, or jaundice.
- Had a body mass index greater than 48 kg/m2 as calculated by weight (kg)/height (m2) or weight (pounds)/height (inches) 2 x 703.
- Was required to take or intended to continue taking any disallowed medication, any prescription medication, herbal treatment or over-the counter medication that may have interfered with evaluation of the study medication, including:
- Chronically used oral glucocorticoids (eg, prednisone, cortisone, hydrocortisone, dexamethasone)
- Niacin greater than100 mg a day, includ
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00225277). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.