Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=566 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Study Evaluating Etanercept and Sulphasalazine in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Ankylosing Spondylitis

Enrolled (actual)
566
Serious AEs
Results posted
Nov 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Patients Achieving Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS 20) — 287; 99 participants — p=<0.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
etanercept (Drug); sulphasalazine (SSZ) (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Primary completion
Feb 2008

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Patients Achieving Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS 20)
287; 99 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Total Score Change From Baseline
11.03; 11.32; 6.21; 9.06 0.719

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of etanercept and sulphasalazine in the treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis
  • Active ankylosing spondylitis

Exclusion Criteria

  • Complete ankylosis of spine
  • Previous treatment with etanercept
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00247962). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search