N/A
Completed N=70
Surgical Study Comparing 2 Procedures for the Treatment of a Dropped Bladder
Prolapse
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00271102 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
70
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Sep 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Change in the Stage of Prolapse of the Anterior Vaginal Wall Before and One Year After Surgery
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether vaginal repair or abdominal repair is the procedure of choice for the surgical management of a prolapsed bladder.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Change in the Stage of Prolapse of the Anterior Vaginal Wall Before and One Year After Surgery |
— | — |
| SECONDARY The Difference in Intra-operative and Post-operative Complications. Patient Satisfaction Before and One Year After Surgery Based on Quality of Life and Sexual Function Questionnaires Specifically Designed for Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse. |
— | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Women over the age of 18 seen at the urogynecology clinic at Geisinger with primary or recurrent pelvic organ prolapse including an anterior vaginal wall relaxation with or without urinary incontinence who are scheduled to have pelvic reconstructive surgery will be eligible to participate in the trial.
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with at least 2 previous prolapse surgeries
- Patients who are pregnant or planning to have a pregnancy
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00271102). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.