Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=190 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Efficacy and Safety Study for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding

Metrorrhagia

Enrolled (actual)
190
Serious AEs
1.6%
Results posted
Jun 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Proportion of Participants With no Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) Symptoms — 0.292; 0.029 Proportion of participants — p=< 0.0001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Estradiol valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027) (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Bayer
Primary completion
May 2008

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Proportion of Participants With no Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) Symptoms
0.292; 0.029 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants Cured From Prolonged Bleeding
0.154; 0.083
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants Cured From Frequent Bleeding
0.250; 0.0
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants Cured From Excessive Bleeding
0.385; 0.05
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84
0.880; 0.509
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196
0.807; 0.419
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84
0.835; 0.426
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196
0.812; 0.383
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for All Participants to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
-353.1; -130.4
SECONDARY
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 1
136.5; 146.9
SECONDARY
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 3
59.9; 139.6
SECONDARY
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 7
41.3; 113.3
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
-411.9; -152.3
SECONDARY
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 1
206.1; 194.7
SECONDARY
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 3
67.1; 147.4
SECONDARY
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 7
47.5; 116.9
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Days to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
-5.2; -2.0
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Episodes to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
-0.5; -0.3
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Number of Sanitary Protection Used at 90 Days of Treatment
-43.6; -21.2
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 84
-1.0; -0.7
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 196
0.7; 1.0
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 84
-3.5; 0.8
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 196
-2.0; -0.8
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 84
-0.0035; -0.0024
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 196
0.0052; 0.0154
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 84
-2.07; -0.26
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 196
-0.07; -0.51
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 84
0.221; 0.106
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 84
0.4; 0.7
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 84
2.38; 3.07
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 84
2.81; 3.91
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 84
0.012; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 84
0.012; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 84
0.012; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 84
0.0; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 84
0.323; 0.407
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 84
0.047; 0.062
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 196
0.129; 0.213
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 196
0.2; 0.4
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 196
2.40; 4.03
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 196
2.48; 4.10
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 196
0.012; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 196
0.024; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 196
0.024; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 196
0.012; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 196
0.241; 0.314
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 196
0.047; 0.043
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) Concentrations at Treatment Day 196
1.30; 0.09
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 84
0.2; -1.5
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 196
5.3; 2.0
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 84
0.22; 0.17
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 196
0.57; 0.20

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the study drug is safe and effective in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Women 18 years or older
  • With diagnosis of dysfunctional uterine bleeding without organic pathology
  • And with at least one of the following symptoms: prolonged, frequent, or excessive bleeding

Exclusion Criteria

  • The use of steroidal oral contraceptives, or any drug that could alter oral contraception metabolism will be prohibited during the study.
  • Women with history of endometrial ablation or dilatation or curettage within 2 months prior to study start will be excluded.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00293059). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search