Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=1,803 Randomized Treatment

Tamoxifen Versus Anastrozole, Alone or in Combination With Zoledronic Acid

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00295646 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
1,803
Serious AEs
17.6%
Results posted
Mar 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Comparison of Anastrozole vs Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Patients With Non-metastatic Breast Cancer With Respect to Disease-free Survival (DFS) — NA; NA; NA; NA years — p=0.59
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
1,022citations · ~60 / year
Endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid in premenopausal breast cancer.
The New England journal of medicine · 2009 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

The primary objective is, first, the comparison of tamoxifen and anastrozole and, second, the comparison of zoledronate added to standard adjuvant therapy with controls according to disease-free survival (DFS) in premenopausal patients with non-metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen or anastrozole. To assess whether zoledronate added to standard adjuvant therapy can decrease or even prevent bone loss in patients treated with hormonal blockade combined with an antiestrogen or aromatase inhibitor.

Linked Publications (5)

  • Endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid in premenopausal breast cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine · 2009 · 1,022 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Adjuvant endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid in premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: 62-month follow-up from the ABCSG-12 randomised trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology · 2011 · 467 citations · Likely link
  • Zoledronic acid combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy of tamoxifen versus anastrozol plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal early breast cancer: final analysis of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 12.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2015 · 307 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Bone-modifying agents for reducing bone loss in women with early and locally advanced breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024 · 17 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Does the number of 6-monthly adjuvant zoledronate infusions received affect treatment efficacy for early breast cancer? A sub-study of ABCSG-12.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2023 · 10 citations · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Comparison of Anastrozole vs Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Patients With Non-metastatic Breast Cancer With Respect to Disease-free Survival (DFS)
NA; NA; NA; NA 0.59
PRIMARY
Comparison of Zoledronate vs no Zoledronate in Premenopausal Patients With Non-metastatic Breast Cancer With Respect to Disease-free Survival (DFS)
NA; NA; NA; NA 0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Comparison of Anastrozole vs Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Patients With Non-metastatic Breast Cancer With Respect to Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)
NA; NA; NA; NA 0.53
SECONDARY
Comparison of Zoledronate vs no Zoledronate in Premenopausal Patients With Non-metastatic Breast Cancer With Respect to Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)
NA; NA; NA; NA 0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Comparison of Anastrozole vs Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Patients With Non-metastatic Breast Cancer With Respect to Overall Survival (OS)
NA; NA; NA; NA 0.07
SECONDARY
Comparison of Zoledronate vs no Zoledronate in Premenopausal Patients With Non-metastatic Breast Cancer With Respect to Overall Survival (OS)
NA; NA; NA; NA 0.10

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Premenopausal, hormone receptor-positive patient
  • Histologically verified (minimally) invasive breast cancer, local radical treatment
  • 0-9 involved axillary lymph nodes (≥ 10 histologically examined nodes)
  • Tumor stage: pT1b-3, yT0 or yT1a

Exclusion Criteria

  • T1a, T4d, yT4; M1
  • Previous breast tumor irradiation
  • Previous or concurrent chemotherapy (except for preoperative chemotherapy)
  • Serum creatinine > 1.5 x UNL or creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00295646) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search