Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 Completed N=143 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

A Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant 250mg, 250mg (Plus 250mg Loading Regimen) and 500mg

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00305448 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
143
Serious AEs
5.6%
Results posted
Aug 2011
Primary outcomePrimary: Objective Response Rate (ORR) — 11.1; 17.6; 10.6 percentage of participants

Summary

This study will assess the relationship between fulvestrant dose and efficacy, and determine the dosing regimen as a second line therapy for Japanese postmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor positive advanced breast cancer.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
11.1; 17.6; 10.6
SECONDARY
Time to Progression (TTP)
169; 211; 169
SECONDARY
Duration of Response (DoR)
SECONDARY
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
42.2; 54.9; 46.8
SECONDARY
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Mean Population Clearance, a Measure of the Efficiency With Which Fulvestrant is Eliminated From the Body
34.4
SECONDARY
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Mean Volume of Distribution at Steady State, a Measure of the Apparent Volume in the Body Into Which Fulvestrant Distributes
35300

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Breast Cancer has continued to grow after having received treatment with an anti-estrogen hormonal treatment such as tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor
  • Requiring hormonal treatment
  • Postmenopausal women defined as a woman who has stopped having menstrual periods

Exclusion Criteria

  • Treatment with more than one previous regimen of systemic anticancer therapy other than endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer
  • Treatment with more than one previous regimen of endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer
  • An existing serious disease, illness, or condition that will prevent participation or compliance with study procedures
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00305448). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search