Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=231 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Efficacy and Safety Study for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding

Metrorrhagia

Enrolled (actual)
231
Serious AEs
1.8%
Results posted
Jul 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Proportion of Participants With no Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) Symptoms — 0.295; 0.012 Proportion of participants — p=< 0.0001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Estradiol valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027) (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Bayer
Primary completion
May 2008

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Proportion of Participants With no Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) Symptoms
0.295; 0.012 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants Cured From Prolonged Bleeding
0.350; 0.100
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants Cured From Excessive Bleeding
0.441; 0.013
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants Cured From Frequent Bleeding
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84
0.838; 0.394
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196
0.847; 0.395
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Patient's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84
0.724; 0.529
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Patient's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196
0.779; 0.451
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for All Participants to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
-458.4; -93.2
SECONDARY
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 1
175.6; 194.3
SECONDARY
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 3
68.3; 195.1
SECONDARY
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 7
44.6; 167.2
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment.
-480.6; -94.2
SECONDARY
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 1.
207.8; 238.9
SECONDARY
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 3.
72.1; 188.4
SECONDARY
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 7.
46.7; 168.6
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Episodes to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
-0.35; -0.38
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Days to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
-5.13; -3.08
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Number of Sanitary Protection Used at 90 Days of Treatment
-38.4; -16.5
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 84
0.36; 0.12
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 196
0.70; 0.06
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Treatment Day 196.
1.63; 0.08
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 84
2.8; 0.0
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 196
8.6; 0.5
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Score at Treatment Day 84.
-1.2; 2.2
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Score at Treatment Day 196.
-2.3; 4.6
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Score at Treatment Day 84
-1.2; 0.4
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Score at Treatment Day 196
-4.9; -2.4
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensional (EQ-5D) Score at Treatment Day 84
-0.0041; 0.0082
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensional (EQ-5D) Score at Treatment Day 196
-0.0191; 0.0116
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 84.
-1.63; 0.62
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 196.
-3.00; 2.69
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 84.
0.095; 0.152
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 196.
0.098; 0.087
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 84
0.14; 0.27
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 196
0.13; 0.52
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 84.
2.0; 3.1
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 196.
1.8; 3.1
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 84
2.1; 3.2
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 196.
2.0; 3.2
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 84
0.008; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 196
0.008; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 84
0.058; 0.031
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 196
0.031; 0.015
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 84
0.0; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 196
0.0; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 84
0.0; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 196
0.0; 0.0
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (no Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 84
0.855; 0.881
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (no Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 196
0.920; 0.879
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Not Have Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 84
0.966; 0.954
SECONDARY
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Not Have Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 196
0.977; 0.985

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the study drug is safe and effective in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Women 18 years or older
  • And with a diagnosis of dysfunctional uterine bleeding without organic pathology
  • And with at least one of the following symptoms: prolonged, frequent or excessive bleeding.

Exclusion Criteria

  • The use of steroidal oral contraceptives, or any drug that could alter oral contraception metabolism will be prohibited during the study.
  • Women with a history of endometrial ablation or dilatation and curettage within 2 months prior to study start will be excluded.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00307801). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search