Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=127 Randomized Treatment

Fluticasone Nasal Spray Patient Preference Study

Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial

Enrolled (actual)
127
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Overall Participants Preference for Nasal Spray Based on Selected Product Attributes at the End of Crossover Dosing — 72; 39; 9; 77 Participants — p=0.003

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
fluticasone propionate (FP) (Drug); fluticasone furoate (FF) (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Primary completion
Dec 2006

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Overall Participants Preference for Nasal Spray Based on Selected Product Attributes at the End of Crossover Dosing
72; 39; 9; 77; 35; 8 0.003 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Preference for Scent/Odor in IAQ and DAQ
62; 12; 71; 16; 27; 22 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Preference for Satisfaction With Scent/Odor in IAQ
11; 16; 12; 20; 13; 25 0.255
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Preference for Satisfaction With Scent/Odor in DAQ
14; 19; 11; 21; 12; 20 0.056
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Who Satisfied Not to Have Scent/Odor in IAQ
46; 10; 7; 2; 1; 0 0.845
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Who Satisfied Not to Have Scent/Odor in DAQ
56; 14; 2; 1; 4; 0 0.871
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Reported Product Have an Immediate Taste in IAQ
98; 69; 10; 25; 7; 13 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Satisfied With an Immediate Taste in IAQ
6; 12; 7; 9; 6; 9 0.592
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Reported Product Have an After Taste in DAQ
90; 66; 22; 33; 7; 10 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Satisfied With an After Taste in DAQ
7; 12; 8; 9; 3; 7 0.434
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Reported Medicine Run Down Throat in IAQ and DAQ
74; 69; 64; 55; 28; 29 0.797
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Reported Medicine Run Out of Nose in IAQ and DAQ
61; 38; 63; 46; 42; 38 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Reported Product Feel Soothing in IAQ and DAQ
28; 24; 26; 25; 28; 31 0.968
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Reported Product Make Want to Sneeze in IAQ
87; 93; 17; 12; 8; 10 0.221
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Satisfied With Product in DAQ
44; 34; 27; 23; 17; 27 0.205
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Reported Nasal Irritation in DAQ
89; 78; 18; 21; 6; 10 0.108
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Reported Nasal Irritation Bothersome in DAQ
7; 7; 15; 22; 9; 8 0.694
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Comply With Product if Prescribed in DAQ
63; 45; 19; 26; 18; 16 0.020 sig

Summary

The objectives of this study are to evaluate and compare patient preference for FF (Fluticasone Furoate) and FP (Fluticasone Propionate Aqueous)nasal sprays in the treatment of allergic rhinitis following single-dose administration.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • allergic rhinitis
  • literate

Exclusion Criteria

  • clinical significant uncontrolled disease
  • Use of intranasal corticosteroids (<4 weeks of FP [branded or generic],<4 week exposure to FF, <4 weeks use of other INS)
  • Use of intranasal medications <1 week
  • Use of meds that significantly inhibit CYP4503A4
  • Use of perfume or oral rinse on study day
  • Allergy/intolerance to INS, antihistamines, or excipients
  • Positive pregnancy test or female who is breastfeeding
  • Affiliation with investigational site
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00398476). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search