Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=278 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Efficacy and Safety of 300 IR Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Tablets in Children Suffering From Grass Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00409409 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
278
Serious AEs
1.4%
Results posted
May 2016
Primary outcomePrimary: Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (ARTSS) — 3.25; 4.51 Units on a scale (range: 0 to 18) — p=0.0010
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
329citations · ~19 / year
Efficacy and safety of 5-grass-pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablets in pediatric allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2009 · High-confidence link

Summary

A phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SLIT for grass pollen allergens compared with placebo for reduction of symptoms and rescue medication usage in children.

Linked Publications

  • Efficacy and safety of 5-grass-pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablets in pediatric allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2009 · 329 citations · High-confidence link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (ARTSS)
3.25; 4.51 0.0010 sig

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or female outpatients aged 5 to 17 years.
  • Written consent / assent.
  • Grass pollen-related allergic rhinoconjunctivitis for at least the last two pollen seasons.
  • Sensitised to grass pollen (positive SPT and grass pollen-specific IgE values of at least Class 2).
  • Total symptom score on the Retrospective RTSS during the previous pollen season of greater than or equal to 12.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who have received any desensitisation treatment for grass pollen.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00409409) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search