Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=591 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

A Study of Abatacept in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative Colitis

Enrolled (actual)
591
Serious AEs
13.5%
Results posted
Dec 2010
Primary outcome: Primary: Induction Period (IP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP Cohort 1 (IP1C) — 30; 26; 14; 41 participants — p=0.124

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
abatacept (ABA) (Drug); placebo (Drug); abatacept (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Primary completion
Jun 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Induction Period (IP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP Cohort 1 (IP1C)
30; 26; 14; 41 0.124
PRIMARY
Maintenance Period (MP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Month 12
11; 11
PRIMARY
Open-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
241; 100; 1; 66; 9; 7
PRIMARY
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
127; 9; 2; 1; 1; 5
PRIMARY
OL; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings
PRIMARY
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
20; 17; 6; 3; 3; 18
PRIMARY
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
4; 3; 3; 17; 1; 10
PRIMARY
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
4; 6; 3; 12; 11; 4
SECONDARY
IP; Baseline Mayo Score: IP1C
8.9; 8.8; 8.6; 8.8
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C
3; 6; 4; 15
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C
24; 20; 11; 36
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C
41; 14; 26; 30 0.044 sig
SECONDARY
IP; Baseline Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score: IP1C
120.0; 121.5; 126.9; 124.3
SECONDARY
IP; Mean Change From Baseline To Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ): IP1C
9.45; 13.36; 9.87; 23.68
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
28; 36; 16; 47; 31; 30
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
13; 8; 4; 14; 14; 21
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
2; 4; 3; 11; 22; 25
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants Who Are Anti-TNF-Inadequate Responders/Anti-TNF Intolerant With Clinical Response At Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C
12; 4; 7; 8 0.149
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response At Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
8; 7; 4; 12
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
2; 0; 0; 4
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
4; 4; 1; 13
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2C
85; 92; 39; 86; 26; 27
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
23; 29; 8; 25; 12; 7
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings: IP1C + IP2C
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
3; 2; 6; 1; 1; 2
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
1; 0; 0; 0; 0; 1
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
1; 6; 2; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
2; 2; 1; 0; 1; 0
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
0; 2; 0; 2; 2; 0
SECONDARY
IP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2C
6; 19; 4; 2; 17; 4
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Month 12
8; 9
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) at Month 12
11; 10
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Both Month 6 and Month 12
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Baseline Oral Corticosteroid Use Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids and Achieved Clinical Remission by Month 12
SECONDARY
MP; Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in IBDQ
SECONDARY
MP; Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Short Form-36 (SF-36)
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Baseline Oral Corticosteroid Use Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids for 90 Consecutive Days and Achieved Clinical Remission by Month 12
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo PGA Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Mucosal Healing at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies
8; 20; 8; 17; 0; 3
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
39; 36; 12; 13; 1; 0
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
39; 36; 5; 2; 1; 0
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
1; 2; 3; 2; 1; 2
SECONDARY
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
0; 2; 3; 3; 0; 1
SECONDARY
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response Over Time
44; 0
SECONDARY
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over Time
18; 0
SECONDARY
OL; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) During OL
0; 0
SECONDARY
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response or Clinical Remission Upon Retreatment With Abatacept Among Those Who Received Abatacept in the IP or MP Period
SECONDARY
OL; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies
66; 59; 11
SECONDARY
OL; Number of Participants Using Corticosteroids During OL

Summary

The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if abatacept can improve signs and symptoms of active ulcerative colitis in patients who have not had an adequate response to other therapies. The safety of this treatment will also be studied

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Men or women 18 years or older
  • Ulcerative colitis for at lease 3 months
  • Moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis
  • Inadequate response or intolerance to standard ulcerative colitis treatment
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00410410). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search