Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=50 Randomized Health Services Research

Advance Supply of Emergency Contraception Compared to Routine Postpartum Care in Teens

Post Partum
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00433004 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
50
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: ABILITY TO FOLLOW POSTPARTUM TEENS FOR 1 YEAR. — 22; 16 Participants
◆ Published Evidence
No publication linked

No peer-reviewed publication reporting this trial's results has been linked yet. This can indicate results are unpublished — a known publication-bias signal. We re-check periodically.

Summary

This is a pilot randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of advanced supply of emergency contraception versus routine care in a teen postpartum population. The goals are to assess feasibility of recruiting and retaining postpartum teens; to obtain estimates of the prevalence of (use of Plan B, primary contraceptive continuation, unprotected intercourse exposure, and pregnancy rates), in postpartum teens given advanced supply of Plan B; to assess whether or not (lack of use of Plan B, contraceptive method non-continuation, and unprotected intercourse exposure), are surrogate markers for risk of unintended pregnancy.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
ABILITY TO FOLLOW POSTPARTUM TEENS FOR 1 YEAR.
22; 16
PRIMARY
PREGNANCY RATES
8; 3
PRIMARY
PLAN B USE
8; 12

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Female
  • English speaking
  • Aged 14-19 at enrollment
  • Immediately postpartum of a live infant
  • Planning to parent the baby
  • Desiring to delay another pregnancy for at least one year
  • General good health
  • Willing and able to follow the study protocol

Exclusion Criteria

  • Allergy to levonorgestrel
  • Current substance abuse
  • Plans for relocation outside of Philadelphia
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00433004). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search