Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=60 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Efficacy of Formoterol vs Ipatropioum Bromide Plus Fenoterol in Children (5-<12 Years) With Acute Bronchial Obstruction

Acute Bronchial Obstruction, Asthma

Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Change in Maximum Expiratory Flow From Baseline to Final Evaluation — 44; 43.67 Liters/minute

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Formoterol fumerate (Drug); fenoterol/ipratropium bromide (Drug)
Age
Pediatric · 5+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Novartis
Primary completion
Sep 2008

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Change in Maximum Expiratory Flow From Baseline to Final Evaluation
44; 43.67
PRIMARY
Mean Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) From Baseline to Final Evaluation
0.32; 0.34
PRIMARY
Mean Change in Pulse Oxymetry From Baseline to Final Evaluation
2.57; 2.83
PRIMARY
Mean Change in the Conway Clinical Scale Score From Baseline to Final Evaluation
-3.18; -3.04
SECONDARY
Safety Assessed by: Pulse Oxymetry, Clinical Assessments, Adverse Events
SECONDARY
Pharmacoeconomic Analysis
9.21; 25.67

Summary

To determine efficacy and tolerability of inhaled Formoterol vs nebulized Ipatropioum Bromide plus Fenoterol in cumulative sequential doses in asthmatic children (5-<12 years) with acute bronchial obstruction attending emergency services

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Asthmatic children 5- 38.5°C axillar temp)
  • Patients with any clinical significance condition

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00460577). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search