Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=106 Randomized Single-blind Health Services Research

Accuracy of Blood Loss Estimation After Vaginal Delivery

Postpartum Hemorrhage

Enrolled (actual)
106
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Difference in Actual Blood Volume and Estimated Blood Volume in Milliliters. — -20.8; -41.7; -53.5; -96.0 milliliters — p=<0.05

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
blood loss estimation (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Northwestern University
Primary completion
Apr 2008

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Difference in Actual Blood Volume and Estimated Blood Volume in Milliliters.
-20.8; -41.7; -53.5; -96.0; -32.8; -145.3 <0.05 sig
SECONDARY
Number and Type of Care Providers Assigned to Study Arms.
21; 22; 20; 22; 12; 9 0.76
SECONDARY
Level of Training
19; 22; 22; 22; 12; 9 0.72
SECONDARY
Number of Years of Clinical Experience Providing Patient Care Requiring Blood Loss Estimation.
30; 29; 11; 13; 12; 11 0.89

Summary

Post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) is defined as blood loss greater than 500 mL after vaginal delivery. Delayed diagnosis of PPH is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Obstetricians estimate blood loss at delivery by visual estimation of blood collected in the obstetric drapes. Blood is often mixed with urine and surgical sponges. The urine, blood, and sponges collect in a cone shaped plastic bag that is suspended from the perineum during delivery. Visual estimation of blood loss is insensitive in diagnosing PPH. In one study visual assessment of blood loss underestimated postpartum blood loss by 33% to 50% compared to an objective measurement of blood loss using photospectrometry. Other studies have shown that the magnitude of underestimation increases as the amount of blood loss is increased. A limitation of previous studies is that there is no "gold standard" for blood loss determination in the third stage of labor. Care providers (obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and labor & delivery nurses) need to be able to accurately estimate blood loss in order to better care for mothers and prevent morbidity and mortality. It is unknown whether provider type or experience (obstetric and anesthesiology resident, fellow, attending physicians, and nurses) influences the accuracy of blood loss estimation, or whether blood loss estimation can be improved by providing graduated markings on the vaginal delivery drape.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Any anesthesia or obstetric attending or resident may participate provided that they have rotated through obstetrics/obstetric anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Any provider that does not complete all of the stations will be excluded from analysis. Any participant who chooses to withdraw from the study will also be excluded from the analysis.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00462839). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search