Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=257 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Armodafinil Treatment as Adjunctive Therapy in Adults With Major Depression Associated With Bipolar I Disorder

Bipolar I Depression

Enrolled (actual)
257
Serious AEs
2.4%
Results posted
Dec 2010
Primary outcome: Primary: The Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 8 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30) — -15.6; -12.5 Units on a scale — p=0.0439

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Armodafinil (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Cephalon
Primary completion
Dec 2008

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
The Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 8 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30)
-15.6; -12.5 0.0439 sig
SECONDARY
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30)
-6.5; -4.8 0.0795
SECONDARY
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30)
-10.0; -7.3 0.0272 sig
SECONDARY
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30)
-13.1; -10.7 0.0802
SECONDARY
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30)
-13.7; -12.1 0.2407
SECONDARY
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30)
-16.7; -13.7 0.0502
SECONDARY
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30)
-17.8; -14.8 0.0612
SECONDARY
Number of Patients Achieving Remission at Endpoint According to the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30)
30; 22; 94; 101 0.1980
SECONDARY
Number of Patients Achieving "Response" at Endpoint According to the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30)
46; 47; 78; 76 0.8960
SECONDARY
Number of Patients Achieving "Sustained Remission" at Endpoint According to the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30)
13; 8; 111; 115 0.2575
SECONDARY
Number of Patients Achieving "Sustained Response" at Endpoint According to the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30)
23; 17; 101; 106 0.3129
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 8 or Last Observation After Baseline) on 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30) Combination of Items 1-3
-1.6; -1.2 0.1565
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 4 on 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30) Combination of Items 1-3
-1.2; -1.1 0.6737
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 8 on 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30) Combination of Items 1-3
-2.0; -1.6 0.2249
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 8 or Last Observation After Baseline) on 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30) - Item 4
-0.4; -0.2 0.0862
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 4 on 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30) - Item 4
-0.2; -0.2 0.9281
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 8 on 30 Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated (IDS C30) - Item 4
-0.3; -0.2 0.4428
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 8 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
-12.3; -10.2 0.0965
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
-9.6; -8.9 0.5389
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
-13.4; -11.0 0.0793
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 8 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - 16 Items (QIDS-SR16)
-7.0; -6.5 0.3814
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - 16 Items (QIDS-SR16)
-3.5; -3.7 0.8099
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - 16 Items (QIDS-SR16)
-5.0; -4.1 0.0968
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - 16 Items (QIDS-SR16)
-5.8; -5.0 0.1605
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - 16 Items (QIDS-SR16)
-6.4; -5.6 0.1869
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - 16 Items (QIDS-SR16)
-7.8; -6.7 0.0817
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - 16 Items (QIDS-SR16)
-8.2; -7.6 0.3712
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 8 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)
8.2; 7.4 0.5427
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)
5.9; 4.6 0.3463
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)
10.1; 8.5 0.2730
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (8 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline) in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score
-4.1; -3.9 0.7791
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to 4 Weeks in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM A) Total Score
-3.6; -3.5 0.9007
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM A) Total Score
-4.7; -4.4 0.6431
SECONDARY
The Number of Responders According to the Clinical Global Impression of Change - Bipolar Version (CGI BP) Measure of Depression at Endpoint (Week 8 or Last Observation After Baseline)
64; 60; 60; 62 0.6631
SECONDARY
The Number of Responders According to the Clinical Global Impression of Change - Bipolar Version (CGI BP) Measure of Depression at Week 1
12; 12; 107; 105 0.9768
SECONDARY
The Number of Responders According to the Clinical Global Impression of Change - Bipolar Version (CGI BP) Measure of Depression at Week 2
25; 26; 83; 84 0.9873
SECONDARY
The Number of Responders According to the Clinical Global Impression of Change - Bipolar Version (CGI BP) Measure of Depression at Week 3
38; 32; 64; 68 0.4567
SECONDARY
The Number of Responders According to the Clinical Global Impression of Change - Bipolar Version (CGI BP) Measure of Depression at Week 4
46; 42; 53; 55 0.6475
SECONDARY
The Number of Responders According to the Clinical Global Impression of Change - Bipolar Version (CGI BP) Measure of Depression at Week 6
47; 43; 45; 49 0.5066
SECONDARY
The Number of Responders According to the Clinical Global Impression of Change - Bipolar Version (CGI BP) Measure of Depression at Week 8
52; 47; 37; 41 0.4438

Summary

The primary objective of the study is to determine if armodafinil treatment, at a dosage of 150 mg/day, is more effective than placebo treatment as adjunctive therapy for adults who are experiencing a major depressive episode associated with Bipolar I Disorder and who are inadequately responsive to their current treatment for a current major depressive episode.

Eligibility Criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria

  • The patient has a diagnosis of Bipolar I Disorder and is currently experiencing a major depressive episode.
  • The patient is currently being treated with 1 or 2 of the following drugs: lithium, olanzapine, or valproic acid.

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • The patient has any Axis I disorder apart from Bipolar I Disorder that was the primary focus of treatment within 6 months before the screening visit (with the exception of nicotine dependence).
  • The patient has any clinically significant uncontrolled medical or surgical condition.
  • The patient has previously received modafinil or armodafinil, or the patient has a known sensitivity to any ingredients in the study drug tablets.
  • The patient is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any woman becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00481195). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search