Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=53 Randomized Treatment

Dynasplint Therapy for Trismus in Head and Neck Cancer

Trismus

Enrolled (actual)
53
Serious AEs
32.1%
Results posted
Jul 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants Demonstrating Improved MIO Using Either the Dynapslint System or Tongue Depressors — 12; 12; 7; 7 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Dynasplint Trismus System (Device); Tongue Depressors (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 19+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Primary completion
Jul 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants Demonstrating Improved MIO Using Either the Dynapslint System or Tongue Depressors
12; 12; 7; 7; 8; 7

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the use of the Dynasplint Trismus System to routine trismus treatment in improving the ability of opening the mouth in a randomized trial. This study will also determine what effects, good and/or bad, this procedure has on the participant. Participants will be randomly assigned to the Dynasplint Trismus System or to routine treatment with tongue depressors.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with 19 years.
  • Patients must sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Severe periodontal or gum disease that has caused teeth to be loose.
  • Any systemic disease that causes blistering of the oral mucosa.
  • Any condition that renders the patient unable to understand the informed consent.
  • Participants who are not able to comply with protocol activities.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00507208). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search