N/A
N=128
Epidural Analgesia (EDA) Versus Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) in Laparoscopic Colon Surgery
Laparoscopic Colectomy
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00508300 ↗Enrolled (actual)
128
Serious AEs
14.8%
Results posted
Feb 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Medical Recovery (Defined as Pain Sufficient Controlled by Oral Analgesia, Fully Mobile Patients or at Least as Mobile as at Admission and Tolerance of the Patient of Oral Food Intake (More Than 2/3 of Daily Meal)) — 5; 4 days
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Epidural analgesia (Procedure); Patient controlled analgesia (Procedure)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University of Lausanne Hospitals
- Primary completion
- Oct 2013
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Medical Recovery (Defined as Pain Sufficient Controlled by Oral Analgesia, Fully Mobile Patients or at Least as Mobile as at Admission and Tolerance of the Patient of Oral Food Intake (More Than 2/3 of Daily Meal)) |
5; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Complication Rate, Peridural Analgesia Failure Rate, Patient Comfort |
— | — |
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a epidural analgesia versus patient controlled analgesia reduces the medical recovery in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colon surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- All patients admitted for elective laparoscopic colonic surgery
Exclusion Criteria
- Age < 18y
- No informed consent
- Emergency situation
- Contraindication for EDA (according to local Anesthesia guidelines)
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00508300). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.