Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=145 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Types of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Moderate to Severe Cervical Dystonia

Spasmodic Torticollis

Enrolled (actual)
145
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Dysphagia Incidence Over 10 Weeks — 10; 12 Number of patients

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
botulinum toxin type A (Biological)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Allergan
Primary completion
Sep 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Dysphagia Incidence Over 10 Weeks
10; 12
SECONDARY
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Total Score at Week 4
40.0; 39.5; 22.0; 25.0
SECONDARY
Physician Assessment of Cervical Dystonia Severity at Week 4
6.0; 7.0; 2.0; 3.0
SECONDARY
Global Assessment of Benefit by Physician at Week 4
3.0; 3.0
SECONDARY
Global Assessment of Benefit by Patient at Week 4
3.0; 3.0
SECONDARY
Patient Assessment of Need for Retreatment at Week 4
54; 54; 19; 15; 1; 1
SECONDARY
Patient Visual Analog Assessment of Pain at Week 4
30.5; 39.5; 8.0; 13.0
SECONDARY
Physician Comparison of Benefit to Previous Injections at Week 10
0; 0; 0; 1; 7; 7
SECONDARY
Patient Comparison of Benefit to Previous Injections at Week 10
0; 0; 1; 2; 8; 10

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two types of botulinum toxin type A to treat the involuntary muscle contractions in the neck

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosed with cervical dystonia/spasmodic torticollis for at least 18 months
  • Successfully treated previously with botulinum toxin type A

Exclusion Criteria

  • Breast feeding, pregnant or could become pregnant
  • Surgery or spinal cord stimulation for cervical dystonia
  • Previous injections of phenol, alcohol for cervical dystonia
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00528541). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search