Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=1,586 Randomized Treatment

Automated Real-time Feedback on CPR Study

Heart Arrest

Enrolled (actual)
1,586
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Rate of ROSC During the Prehospital Resuscitation — 361; 345 Participants — p=0.96

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Laerdal Q-CPR /technology (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Washington
Primary completion
Jun 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Rate of ROSC During the Prehospital Resuscitation
361; 345 0.96
SECONDARY
Pulses Present at ED Arrival.
260; 243 0.71
SECONDARY
Survival to Hospital Discharge
92; 96 0.21
SECONDARY
CPR Fraction
66; 64 0.016 sig
SECONDARY
Compression Depth
39.6; 37.8 0.005 sig
SECONDARY
Compression Rate
103.1; 108.0 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Compressions With an Incomplete Release
10.4; 14.6 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Ventilation Rate
5.8; 5.6 0.73

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether or not real-time feedback on CPR process variables will increase rates of restoration of spontaneous circulation during prehospital resuscitation and upon arrival at the receiving emergency room as well as increase rates of survival to hospital discharge.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • all individuals who experience cardiac arrest outside the hospital,
  • are evaluated by organized EMS personnel and: a) receive attempts at external defibrillation (by lay responders or emergency personnel) or receive chest compressions by organized EMS personnel.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Use of a mechanical CPR device
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00539539). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search