Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=163 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Pazopanib Plus Lapatinib Compared To Lapatinib Alone In Subjects With Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Neoplasms, Breast

Enrolled (actual)
163
Serious AEs
21.5%
Results posted
Jul 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR), Defined as Those Participants Achieving Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), Assessed Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.0 and Cutaneous Lesions — 11; 17; 17; 4 participants — p=<0.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
lapatinib (Drug); Pazopanib (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Primary completion
May 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR), Defined as Those Participants Achieving Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), Assessed Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.0 and Cutaneous Lesions
11; 17; 17; 4; 22 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Median Duration of Response,Defined as the First Documented Evidence of CR or PR Until the First Documentation of Disease Progression
16.9; 13.0; 13.6; 31.2; 12.7
SECONDARY
Progression-free Survival, Defined as the Interval Between the Date of Randomization and the Earliest Date of Disease Progression (PD) or Death Due to Any Cause (Defined by an Investigator Review of Lesions Based on RECIST and Cutaneous Disease)
16.1; 14.3; 16.0; 11.4; 16.0
SECONDARY
Overall Survival
14.7; 16.2; 15.9; NA; NA

Summary

The double blind part of the study is being conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in combination with lapatinib with that of lapatinib alone in subjects with inflammatory breast cancer whose tumors overexpress the ErbB2 protein. There is also an Open-label pazopanib arm to this study designed to test whether pazopanib given alone and lapatinib given alone would be safe and effective to treat patients with inflammatory breast cancer.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

Specific information regarding warnings, precautions, contraindications, adverse events, and other pertinent information on the investigational product that may impact patient eligibility is provided in the pazopanib IB and lapatinib prescribing information (or the lapatinib IB).

For Cohort 1 of this study, eligible patients met inclusion criteria outlined in the original version of the protocol and protocol amendment 1.

For Cohort 2 of this study, eligible patients must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Patients must have evaluable Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) substantiated by all of the following prior to randomization:
  • History of invasive breast cancer documented by a biopsy and accompanying pathology report
  • Current photographs* (global view and close-up views of all skin lesions) submitted at screening demonstrating unequivocal evidence of IBC as determined by either the medical monitor alone or in consultation with one or more of the study Principal Investigators.
  • All patients must have photography at screening. Canfield Scientific Inc. will provide centralized monitoring, tracking, and collection of patients' photographs throughout the study. Screening photographs must be uploaded to the Canfield Scientific Inc website and approved by Canfield Scientific Inc, as the central photography vendor. The photographs, along with the completed Inflammatory Breast Cancer Skin Assessment Tool (IBSAT), must be reviewed and approved by GSK before a patient can be randomized. Sites should allow a minimum of 3 business days for this process. Sites submitting quality photographs and IBSATs on a regular basis will receive an exemption from this requirement for future patients.
  • Patients with secondary IBC are eligible.
  • Measurable lesions (cutaneous or radiographic) may be in the field of prior standard or palliative radiation therapy; however, there must be at least a 4 week period between the last radiation treatment and the baseline scan documenting disease status for the lesion to be measurable. If the irradiated lesion is the only site of disease, documented progression of the irradiated lesion is required.
  • Disease progression or relapse following treatment for invasive breast cancer, which must have included a chemotherapy regimen. In regions where trastuzumab is available with no barriers to access*, patients must have received prior trastuzumab in addition to chemotherapy in order to be eligible. * (Barriers to access may include financial considerations.)
  • Unequivocal ErbB2 overexpressing breast cancer, defined as 3+ staining by immunohistochemistry (IHC), or 2+ staining by IHC in conjunction with ErbB2 gene amplification by FISH/CISH, or ErbB2 gene amplification by FISH/CISH alone (in subjects whose tumor blocks were not assessed by IHC). ErbB2 gene amplification is defined by: > six (6) ErbB2 gene copies/nucleus for test systems without an internal control probe or an ErbB2/CEP 17 ratio of more than 2.2.

Sites must submit a copy of the laboratory report demonstrating unequivocal ErbB2 overexpression, if testing performed at a local laboratory, with the screening worksheet. Archived tumor must be provided for all patients for ErbB2 FISH testing by the central laboratory. Patients will remain on study based on local ErbB2 expression results. If archived tumor is not available, a biopsy must be obtained at screening and sent to TMD Laboratories for ErbB2 FISH testing.

  • Patients must provide written informed consent prior to performance of study-specific procedures or assessments, and must be willing to comply with treatment and follow up. Procedures conducted as part of the patient's routine clinical management (e.g., blood count, imaging study) and obtained prior to signing of informed consent may be utilized for screening or baseline purposes provided these procedures are conducted as specified in the protocol.

Note: Informed consent may be obtained prior to the protocol-specified

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00558103). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search