Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=30 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Microcurrent for Healing Autogenous Skin Donor Sites

Burns

Enrolled (actual)
30
Serious AEs
8.0%
Results posted
Jun 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Time to Wound Healing — 10.8; 11.1 days

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Microcurrent stimulator (Device); Silverlon Wound Contact Dressing (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research
Primary completion
Oct 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Time to Wound Healing
10.8; 11.1

Summary

This single-center, prospective, randomized, and controlled study evaluated the efficacy of silver-coated dressing with active microcurrent in comparison to silver-coated dressing with sham microcurrent on wound-closure time for autogenous skin donor sites.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • between 18-65 years of age
  • burn less than 30% total body surface area
  • burns not involving donor site area
  • you need skin grafting to cover burns
  • agree not to use other electronic devices that generate current during your study participation
  • agree to come back for follow up visits at least every other day after discharge from hospital until donor site is healed

Exclusion Criteria

  • you have an illness that may affect how your wound heals such as diabetes, blood clotting disorder, cirrhosis, liver failure, peripheral vascular disease
  • you are taking medications that could affect how your wound heals such as steroids, Plavix, Coumadin
  • you have an infection of the skin or your bloodstream
  • you are pregnant or nursing
  • you are sensitive or allergic to silver or nylon
  • your burn wounds are more than 30% of your total body surface area
  • your site was previously harvested for grafting
  • you have an implantable pacemaker device
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00558701). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search