Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=426 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety of Ospemifene

Atrophy · Vaginal Diseases
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00566982 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
426
Serious AEs
5.2%
Results posted
Jun 2013
Primary outcomePrimary: Mean Change From Baseline in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in Maturation Index of Vaginal Smear — 5.0; -46.0 percentage of parabasal cells

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and long-term safety of 60mg ospemifene in the treatment of VVA in postmenopausal women with intact uterus.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in Maturation Index of Vaginal Smear
5.0; -46.0
PRIMARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Percentage of Superficial Cells in Maturation Index of Vaginal Smear
1.0; 10.3
PRIMARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Vaginal pH
-0.16; -1.21
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Estradiol Levels
0.004; 0.004
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Luteinizing Hormone Levels
-0.88; -3.16
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Follicle Stimulating Hormone Levels
-7.63; -19.69
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Sex Hormone Binding Globulin Levels
-0.8; 31.0
SECONDARY
Visual Evaluation of the Vagina (Baseline & Week 52)
10; 20; 74; 241; 28; 12

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Naturally or surgically menopausal
  • Intact uterus
  • Vaginal pH greater than 5.0
  • 5% or fewer superficial cells in maturation index of vaginal smear

Exclusion Criteria

  • Evidence of endometrial hyperplasia, cancer or other pathology
  • Abnormal Pap smear
  • Uterine bleeding of unknown origin or uterine polyps
  • Current vaginal infection requiring medication
  • Use of hormonal medications
  • Clinically significant abnormal gynecological findings other than signs of vaginal atrophy
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00566982). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search