Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=14 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Rilonacept for Treatment of Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF)

Familial Mediterranean Fever

Enrolled (actual)
14
Serious AEs
22.2%
Results posted
Oct 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: To Assess the Efficacy of Rilonacept in Decreasing the Number of Acute FMF Attacks. — 0.77; 2.00 number of attacks per month — p=0.027

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Rilonacept (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 4+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
Primary completion
Sep 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
To Assess the Efficacy of Rilonacept in Decreasing the Number of Acute FMF Attacks.
0.77; 2.00 0.027 sig
PRIMARY
To Determine if There is a Medically Important Difference Between the Safety Profiles of Rilonacept vs. Placebo.
1; 0; 0; 0.18 0.047 sig
SECONDARY
To Determine the Difference in the Length of Attacks During Treatment With Rilonacept vs. Placebo.
2.8; 3.2 0.32
SECONDARY
Percentage of Treatment Courses Without FMF Attacks in Rilonacept Courses as Compared to Placebo Courses.
29; 0 0.004 sig
SECONDARY
To Determine the Proportion of Courses in Which Subjects Attained at Least a 50% Decrease in Acute FMF Attacks During Rilonacept Courses as Compared to Placebo Courses.
75; 35 0.006 sig
SECONDARY
To Determine Differences in the Time to the Development of Attacks Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo).
90; 36 0.009 sig
SECONDARY
To Determine the Differences in the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo).
5.8; 14 0.156
SECONDARY
To Determine the Differences in C-Reactive Protein Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo)
2; 4 0.22
SECONDARY
To Determine the Differences in the Platelet Count Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo)
262; 334 0.078
SECONDARY
To Determine the Differences in the Fibrinogen Levels Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo)
6.56; 9.56 0.063
SECONDARY
To Determine the Differences in Serum Amyloid A Levels Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo)
13; 15 0.50
SECONDARY
To Determine the Differences in the Quality of Life Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo).
33; 20.3; 53.3; 49.8 0.021 sig
SECONDARY
To Determine the Differences in the FMF Severity Score of the Subjects Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo).
5.5; 11 0.136
SECONDARY
To Determine the Differences in the Proportion of Time Subjects Received Rilonacept vs Placebo
52.5; 47.5 0.089

Summary

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a genetic disease resulting in recurrent attacks of fever, abdominal pain, chest pain, arthritis and rash. There are 5-15% of patients who continue to have FMF attacks despite treatment with colchicine or who cannot tolerate colchicine. Currently there are no alternatives to colchicine. Pyrin, the protein that has a defect in FMF has an important role in the regulation of a molecule called interleukin (IL)-1 beta production and activity. This molecule is very important in the process of inflammation in FMF. Therefore we propose to use IL-1 Trap (Rilonacept), a medication that binds and neutralizes IL-1. We will enroll in this study 17 subjects from the age of 4 years, including adults with active FMF despite colchicine therapy. Subjects will receive in random order two 3-month courses of Rilonacept at 2.2 mg/kg (maximum 160 mg) by weekly subcutaneous injection and two 3-month courses of placebo injection. If patients have at least two FMF attacks during a treatment course they will be able to get if they choose the other treatment until the end of that treatment course. Our hypothesis is that Rilonacept will decrease the number of acute FMF attacks and will be safe to use. This study may confirm the importance of IL-1 in the cause of FMF. Funding source - FDA Office of Orphan Products Development

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject has a definitive diagnosis of FMF as by the Tel-Hashomer clinical criteria (long version of criteria) with at least one mutation on one of the MEFV gene alleles. However, subjects with an isolated heterozygous mutation of exon 2 of the MEFV gene (including E148Q) will not be eligible.
  • Subject must have an estimated mean of at least one acute FMF attack per month before and during the month of screening.
  • Subject is at least four years of age (with no upper limit of age).
  • Subjects must have received an adequate trial of colchicine defined as treatment of at least 1.5 mg/d for at least 3 months if ≥6 years old or 1.2 mg/d if less than 6 years, or an inability to tolerate colchicine due to adverse effects in a dose that controls acute attacks in the frequency of less than one attack per month.
  • If subject is being treated with anakinra at the time of consent, washout must be done (about 3 days). Subject must experience 2 attacks before randomization visit can occur.
  • If subject has been treated previously with anti-TNF drugs, appropriate washout must be done. Etanercept must be discontinued for 4 weeks prior to randomization; Adalimumab and Infliximab must be discontinued for 8 weeks prior to randomization.
  • If subject is a female of childbearing potential, she must agree to use adequate contraception (adequate contraception can include abstinence) for the duration of the trial and 3 months after and must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test prior to administration of study medication.
  • If subject is a male and has reached puberty, he must agree to use adequate contraception or abstinence during the study and for 3 months after discontinuation from study.
  • Subject's parent or legal guardian has provided written informed consent prior to screening for this study or if subject is older than 18 years has provided informed consent him/herself.
  • Subject, if applicable, has assented to participate prior to screening for this study.
  • Subject and, if applicable, parent/legal guardian, agree to comply with study requirements and are able to come to the clinic for all required study visits.

Exclusion Criteria

  • The subject has existing biopsy proven amyloidosis or proteinuria >0.5 gram per day.
  • The subject has another active inflammatory rheumatic disease.
  • The subject has an active malignancy of any type, or history of a malignancy.
  • The subject has active GI disease (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease), a chronic or acute renal or hepatic disorder, or a significant coagulation defect.
  • The subject has an AST (SGOT), ALT (SGPT) or BUN >2 x ULN or creatinine >1.5 mg/dL or any other laboratory abnormality considered by the examining physician to be clinically significant within 28 days before the Baseline visit.
  • Current use of an anti-tumor necrosis factor drug.
  • The subject has, in the investigator's opinion, a chronic condition (e.g., diabetes, epilepsy) that is either not stable or well-controlled and may interfere with the conduct of the study.
  • The subject has received any investigational medication within 30 days before the first dose of study medication or is scheduled to receive an investigational drug, other than study medications described in this protocol, during the course of the study.
  • The subject has chronic or active infection or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with i.v. antibiotics within 30 days or oral antibiotics within 14 days prior to the screening evaluation.
  • The subject has known positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status.
  • The subject has known past or current hepatitis.
  • The subject has received a live virus vaccine within 1 month prior to the baseline visit.
  • The subject has a positive PPD test.
  • The subject is sexually active and not practicing effective birth control.
  • The subject is pregnant or breast feeding a child.
  • Any concurrent medical condition which would, in the investigator's opinion, c
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00582907). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search