Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=89 Single-blind Diagnostic

Comparison of MRI and Molecular Breast Imaging in Breast Diagnostic Evaluation

Breast Cancer

Enrolled (actual)
89
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Sensitivity on the Per Patient Level — 25; 27 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Molecular Breast Imaging (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 25+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Primary completion
Dec 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Sensitivity on the Per Patient Level
25; 27
SECONDARY
Sensitivity on the Per Tumor Level
32; 36
SECONDARY
Specificity
38; 37

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity of Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI) relative to MRI of the breast in patients undergoing MRI for a clinical concern, or abnormal diagnostic mammogram and/or ultrasound study.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • This study will include a population of women aged 25 or older who are scheduled for a breast MRI examination at MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER.
  • Patients must not be lactating or pregnant.
  • All women of child-bearing potential must have had a negative urine pregnancy test result within 2 days prior to the MBI study.
  • women who are scheduled for a breast MRI examination for a clinical concern, problem solving or for further evaluation of invasive breast cancer (e.g. pre-operative staging of known breast cancer).

Exclusion Criteria

  • They are unable to understand and sign the consent form
  • They are pregnant or lactating
  • They are physically unable to sit upright and still for 40 minutes.
  • The breast MRI is for screening purposes or to determine the status of breast augmentation.
  • They have undergone breast surgery within the previous year
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00591864). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search