Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=284 Randomized Single-blind Diagnostic

Clinical Evaluation of Narrow Band Imaging Colonoscope

Colonic Neoplasms
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00628147 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
284
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Neoplasm Miss Rate — 12.6; 12.1 Miss rate percentage
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
157citations · ~9 / year
A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates.
Gut · 2008 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine if colonoscopic examination using a colonoscope with a narrow band imaging light is more effective at detecting polyps compared to a colonoscope with standard full spectrum white light.

Linked Publications

  • A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates.
    Gut · 2008 · 157 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Neoplasm Miss Rate
12.6; 12.1
SECONDARY
Neoplasm Detection Rates
69; 66; 29; 31; 40; 35
SECONDARY
Completion of Examinations
135; 141
SECONDARY
Procedure Complications
0; 0

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • referred for elective outpatient colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

  • known inflammatory bowel disease
  • personal or family history of polyposis syndrome
  • referral for resection of a known lesion
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00628147) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search