Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=350 Randomized Double-blind Supportive Care

Comparative Performance of a Bausch & Lomb Multipurpose Solution and Alcon OptiFree Replenish Multipurpose Solution

Adverse Effect of Contact Lens Solution

Enrolled (actual)
350
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Subjective Assessment of Comfort and Cleanliness — 89.71; 89.26; 87.45; 86.63 Scores on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Bausch & Lomb Multipurpose Solution (Device); Alcon OptiFree Replenish Multipurpose Solution (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Primary completion
Mar 2008

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Subjective Assessment of Comfort and Cleanliness
89.71; 89.26; 87.45; 86.63; 82.98; 82.34
SECONDARY
Symptoms and Complaints
85.4; 86.1; 79.2; 79.3; 87.0; 88.9
SECONDARY
Graded Slit Lamp Findings > Grade 2
0; 0; 0; 0; 3; 0

Summary

To evaluate the product performance of a Bausch & Lomb Multipurpose solution when compared to Alcon OptiFree Replenish Multipurpose Solution

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects are adapted wearers of silicone hydrogel contact lenses
  • VA correctable to 0.3 LogMAR or better (driving vision)
  • Clear central cornea
  • Subject uses a lens care system on a regular basis

Exclusion Criteria

  • Systemic disease affecting ocular health
  • Using systemic or topical medications
  • wear a monovision, multifocal or toric contact lenses
  • Any grade 2 or greater slit lamp findings
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00636194). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search