N/A
N=227
Pivotal Study for the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
Stenoses
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00678249 ↗Enrolled (actual)
227
Serious AEs
4.9%
Results posted
May 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Percent of Participants With Treatment Area Primary Patency (TAPP) — 51; 23; 60 Percentage of Participants — p=<0.001
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft (Device); PTA (Procedure)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- C. R. Bard
- Primary completion
- Jun 2004
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Percent of Participants With Treatment Area Primary Patency (TAPP) |
51; 23; 60 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Total Number of Adverse Events |
106; 106; 33 | — |
| SECONDARY Percent of Participants With Successful Delivery of the Device |
99; 100 | — |
| SECONDARY Percent of Participants With Procedural Success |
94; 73; 95 | — |
| SECONDARY Percent of Participants With TAPP |
80; 77; 89 | — |
| SECONDARY Percent of Participants With Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP) |
38; 20; 43 | — |
| SECONDARY Percent of Participants With Access Circuit Assisted Primary Patency (ACAPP) |
66; 74; 66 | — |
| SECONDARY Percent of Participants With Access Circuit Cumulative Patency (ACCP or Secondary Patency) |
81; 86; 91 | — |
| SECONDARY Percent of Participants With Binary Restenosis |
28; 78; 25 | — |
Summary
This study compared the FLAIR™ Endovascular Stent Graft to balloon angioplasty in patients with stenoses at the venous anastomosis of a synthetic AV access graft.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Male or female patients between 18 to 90 years of age whose hemodialysis access was a synthetic AV access graft located in an arm.
- Angiographic evidence of one or more stenoses, 7 cm or less in length and greater than or equal to 50%, at the graft-vein anastomosis of a synthetic AV access graft. The entire lesion must have been located within 7 cm of the anastomosis such that approximately 1 cm of the IMPRA/Bard Device must have extended into non-diseased vein and approximately 1 cm, but no more than 2 cm, of the IMPRA/Bard Device will be extended into non-diseased AV graft.
- Clinical evidence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis.
- Percutaneous endovascular therapy for the identified lesion was the best treatment choice in the opinion of the investigator.
- Patients must have been able to understand and provide informed consent.
- Patients whose synthetic AV access grafts had been implanted greater than 30 days and had undergone 1 or more successful hemodialysis sessions.
- During primary balloon angioplasty, full expansion of an appropriately sized angioplasty balloon, in the operator's judgment, must have been achieved.
Exclusion Criteria
- Concomitant disease (e.g., terminal cancer) or other medical condition that was likely to result in death of the patient within 6 months of the time of implantation.
- Stenoses that had a corresponding thrombosis treated within 7 days.
- The presence of a second lesion in the access circuit less than or equal to 3 cm from the edges of the primary lesion that was treated within 30 days or that was greater than or equal to 30%. Access circuit was defined as the area from the AV access graft arterial anastomosis to the superior vena cava-right atrial junction.
- The presence of a second lesion in the access circuit greater than 3 cm from the edges of the primary lesion that was greater than or equal to 30%. Second lesions that were greater than or equal to 30% must have been treated prior to patient inclusion to reduce the percent stenosis to less than 30%.
- Patients who were unwilling or unable to return for follow-up visits or patients with whom follow-up visits may have been unreliable.
- Patients who had a stent placed at the target lesion site.
- Patients with a blood coagulative disorder or sepsis.
- Patients in which the IMPRA/Bard Device would have been required to cross an angle (between the inflow vein and synthetic AV access graft) that was greater than 90 degrees.
- Patients in which the IMPRA/Bard Device would have been required to be deployed fully across the elbow joint, which is identified radiographically by a combination of the humeroulnar joint and the humeroradial joint.
- Patients with a contraindication to the use of contrast media.
- Patients whose AV access graft was infected.
- Patients who were currently or were scheduled to enroll in other investigations that conflicted with follow-up testing or confounds data in this trial.
- Procedural use of another investigational device.
- Patients who were pregnant.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00678249). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.