Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=227 Randomized Treatment

Pivotal Study for the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft

Stenoses

Enrolled (actual)
227
Serious AEs
4.9%
Results posted
May 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Percent of Participants With Treatment Area Primary Patency (TAPP) — 51; 23; 60 Percentage of Participants — p=<0.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft (Device); PTA (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
C. R. Bard
Primary completion
Jun 2004

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percent of Participants With Treatment Area Primary Patency (TAPP)
51; 23; 60 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Total Number of Adverse Events
106; 106; 33
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Successful Delivery of the Device
99; 100
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Procedural Success
94; 73; 95
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With TAPP
80; 77; 89
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP)
38; 20; 43
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Access Circuit Assisted Primary Patency (ACAPP)
66; 74; 66
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Access Circuit Cumulative Patency (ACCP or Secondary Patency)
81; 86; 91
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Binary Restenosis
28; 78; 25

Summary

This study compared the FLAIR™ Endovascular Stent Graft to balloon angioplasty in patients with stenoses at the venous anastomosis of a synthetic AV access graft.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or female patients between 18 to 90 years of age whose hemodialysis access was a synthetic AV access graft located in an arm.
  • Angiographic evidence of one or more stenoses, 7 cm or less in length and greater than or equal to 50%, at the graft-vein anastomosis of a synthetic AV access graft. The entire lesion must have been located within 7 cm of the anastomosis such that approximately 1 cm of the IMPRA/Bard Device must have extended into non-diseased vein and approximately 1 cm, but no more than 2 cm, of the IMPRA/Bard Device will be extended into non-diseased AV graft.
  • Clinical evidence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis.
  • Percutaneous endovascular therapy for the identified lesion was the best treatment choice in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Patients must have been able to understand and provide informed consent.
  • Patients whose synthetic AV access grafts had been implanted greater than 30 days and had undergone 1 or more successful hemodialysis sessions.
  • During primary balloon angioplasty, full expansion of an appropriately sized angioplasty balloon, in the operator's judgment, must have been achieved.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Concomitant disease (e.g., terminal cancer) or other medical condition that was likely to result in death of the patient within 6 months of the time of implantation.
  • Stenoses that had a corresponding thrombosis treated within 7 days.
  • The presence of a second lesion in the access circuit less than or equal to 3 cm from the edges of the primary lesion that was treated within 30 days or that was greater than or equal to 30%. Access circuit was defined as the area from the AV access graft arterial anastomosis to the superior vena cava-right atrial junction.
  • The presence of a second lesion in the access circuit greater than 3 cm from the edges of the primary lesion that was greater than or equal to 30%. Second lesions that were greater than or equal to 30% must have been treated prior to patient inclusion to reduce the percent stenosis to less than 30%.
  • Patients who were unwilling or unable to return for follow-up visits or patients with whom follow-up visits may have been unreliable.
  • Patients who had a stent placed at the target lesion site.
  • Patients with a blood coagulative disorder or sepsis.
  • Patients in which the IMPRA/Bard Device would have been required to cross an angle (between the inflow vein and synthetic AV access graft) that was greater than 90 degrees.
  • Patients in which the IMPRA/Bard Device would have been required to be deployed fully across the elbow joint, which is identified radiographically by a combination of the humeroulnar joint and the humeroradial joint.
  • Patients with a contraindication to the use of contrast media.
  • Patients whose AV access graft was infected.
  • Patients who were currently or were scheduled to enroll in other investigations that conflicted with follow-up testing or confounds data in this trial.
  • Procedural use of another investigational device.
  • Patients who were pregnant.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00678249). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search