Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=172 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Strattice in Repair of Inguinal Hernias

Hernia, Inguinal

Enrolled (actual)
172
Serious AEs
3.5%
Results posted
Mar 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 3 Months — -7.49; -6.12 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Inguinal hernia repair with Ultrapro (Device); Inguinal hernia repair with Strattice (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Male
Sponsor
LifeCell
Primary completion
Jun 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 3 Months
-7.49; -6.12
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 6 Months
-8.17; -7.20
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 12 Months
-8.78; -7.61
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 24 Months
-7.57; -7.53

Summary

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, third-party blinded, multicenter, interventional evaluation of inguinal hernia repair comparing Strattice to light weight polypropylene mesh. Performance and outcomes measures to be compared include postoperative resumption of activities of daily living, nature and incidence of short- and long-term pain and complications, and incidence of hernia recurrence.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • adult male
  • symptomatic and palpable inguinal hernia
  • open, elective, primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair

Exclusion Criteria

  • bilateral inguinal hernia repair
  • BMI >35
  • chronic immunosuppression, active chemo/radiation therapy, uncontrolled diabetes, severe liver disease or COPD
  • chronic prostatitis, orchitis, testicular pain
  • local or systemic infection at time of repair
  • known collagen disorder
  • chronic pain syndrome or under active pain management
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00681291). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search