Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=819 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Once Daily Amlodipine/Valsartan 5/80 as Compared to Amlodipine/Valsartan 5/40 or to Amlodipine 5 mg Monotherapy in Patients 65 Years of Age and Older With Essential Hypertension

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00699192 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
819
Serious AEs
1.0%
Results posted
Jun 2011
Primary outcomePrimary: Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) From Baseline to End of Study (Week 8) — -11.1; -12.3; -6.9 mmHg

Summary

To characterize the safety, tolerability, and efficacy profile of amlodipine/valsartan 5/80 mg as compared to amlodipine/valsartan 5/40 mg (with optional titration to 5/80 mg) and amlodipine 5 mg monotherapy in elderly patients (≥ 65 years of age) with essential hypertension. All three regimens are expected to be well tolerated.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) From Baseline to End of Study (Week 8)
-11.1; -12.3; -6.9
SECONDARY
Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) From Baseline to End of Study (Week 8)
-4.2; -5.3; -1.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Patients Achieving a Systolic Blood Pressure Response at Week 8
46.0; 48.3; 34.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Patients Achieving Systolic Blood Pressure Control at the End of the Study (Week 8)
31.3; 37.5; 20.5
SECONDARY
Percentage of Patients Achieving Overall Blood Pressure Control at the End of the Study (Week 8)
30.9; 36.4; 19.0

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Provide written informed consent before any assessment was performed.
  • Male or female at least 65 years of age.
  • Diagnosed as having hypertension:
  • At Visit 1/Screening, treatment naïve patients had to have a mean seated SBP ≥ 155 mmHg and < 180 mmHg; patients undergoing washout from their previous antihypertension medication had to have a mean seated SBP <180 mmHg.
  • At Visit 2/Single-blind run-in entry, all patients had to have a mean seated SBP ≥ 155 mmHg and < 180 mmHg.
  • At Visit 3/Core double-blind treatment period entry, all patients had to have a mean seated SBP ≥ 145 mmHg and < 180 mmHg.
  • Ability to communicate and comply with all study requirements including measuring their blood pressure at home, daily as instructed, using the home blood pressure monitor provided by the Sponsor.
  • Female patients had to be post-menopausal for at least one year.

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe hypertension (mean seated SBP ≥ 180 mmHg and/or a mean seated DBP ≥ 110 mmHg).
  • History of secondary hypertension (including primary aldosteronism, renovascular hypertension, pheochromocytoma, etc.).
  • Use of three or more antihypertensive drugs. Dual fixed dose combination therapy was considered as two antihypertensive drugs.
  • Administration of any agent indicated for the treatment of hypertension after Visit 1, with the permitted exception of those antihypertensive medications requiring tapering down (e.g. beta-blocker and/or clonidine) commencing with Visit 1.
  • Known moderate or malignant retinopathy. Moderate was defined as retinal signs of hemorrhage, microaneurysm, cotton-wool spot, hard exudates, or a combination thereof; malignant defined as signs of moderate retinopathy plus swelling of the optic disk.
  • Known or suspected contraindications, including history of allergy or hypersensitivity to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), or to drugs with similar chemical structures.
  • History of cerebrovascular accident, thrombotic stroke, or transient ischemic attack.
  • Significant history of coronary artery disease (CAD) such as any history of myocardial infarction (MI), angina pectoris, and all types of revascularization procedures.
  • History of or diagnosis of congestive heart failure Grade II-IV according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification.
  • Clinically significant valvular heart disease.
  • All patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus and those patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus who, in the opinion of the investigator, were not well controlled. Patients who needed oral anti-diabetic medication to adequately control their Type 2 diabetes had to be on a stable dose of oral anti-diabetic medication for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
  • Concomitant potentially life threatening arrhythmia or symptomatic arrhythmia.
  • Second or third degree heart block with or without a pacemaker.
  • Significant hepatic disease, as demonstrated by any one of the following: aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values greater than two times the upper limit of normal at Visit 1, a history of hepatic encephalopathy, a history of esophageal varices, or a history of a portocaval shunt.
  • Evidence of renal impairment as determined by any one of the following: glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 50 ml/min/1.73m2 as measured by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula at Visit 1, a history of dialysis, or a history of nephrotic syndrome.
  • History of clinically significant allergies including asthma and/or multiple drug allergies.
  • Any surgical or medical condition with the potential to significantly alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of any drug including but not limited to any of the following: history of major gastrointestinal tract surgery such as gastrectomy, gastroenterostomy, bowel resection, gastric bypass, gastric stapling, or gastric banding, currently active or inactive inflammatory bowel syndrome within 1
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00699192). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search