Phase 2
N=45
Efficacy and Safety Study of Fibrin Sealant With 4 IU/mL Thrombin, Vapor Heated, Solvent Detergent Treated (FS VH S/D 4) in Face-Lift Procedures
Facial Rhytidectomy (Face-lift)
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00708071 ↗Enrolled (actual)
45
Serious AEs
0.7%
Results posted
Aug 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Postoperative Day 3 — 5; 12; 11; 0 participants — p=0.143
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Interventions
- Fibrin Sealant with 4 IU/ml Thrombin, Vapor-Heated, Solvent Detergent Treated Containing Synthetic Aprotinin (FS VH S/D 4) (Biological)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Baxter Healthcare Corporation
- Primary completion
- Sep 2008
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Postoperative Day 3 |
5; 12; 11; 0 | 0.143 |
| PRIMARY Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) Related to Study Product (FS VH S/D 4) Throughout the Study Period |
— | — |
| SECONDARY Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Day 1 |
2; 11; 16; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Day 5 |
5; 8; 14; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Day 7 |
9; 8; 14; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Day 10 |
7; 7; 14; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Day 14 |
5; 6; 14; 1 | — |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by 5 Independent, Blinded Reviewers- Day 1 |
0.0 | 0.645 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by 5 Independent, Blinded Reviewers- Day 3 |
-0.2 | 0.103 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by 5 Independent, Blinded Reviewers- Day 5 |
0.0 | 0.833 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by 5 Independent, Blinded Reviewers- Day 7 |
0.0 | 0.501 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by 5 Independent, Blinded Reviewers- Day 10 |
0.0 | 0.247 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by 5 Independent, Blinded Reviewers- Day 14 |
0.0 | 0.715 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by a Blinded On-site Evaluator-Day 3 |
0.00 | — |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades of Edema Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator Day 1 |
0.00 | 0.754 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades of Edema Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator Day 3 |
0.0 | 0.388 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades of Edema Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator Day 5 |
0.0 | 0.234 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades of Edema Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator Day 7 |
0.0 | 0.688 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades of Edema Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator Day 10 |
0.0 | 0.625 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades of Edema Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator Day 14 |
0.0 | 0.688 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator- Day 1 |
0.0 | 1.000 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator- Day 3 |
0.0 | 0.521 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator- Day 5 |
0.0 | 0.324 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator- Day 7 |
0.0 | 0.661 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator- Day 10 |
0.0 | 1.000 |
| SECONDARY Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator- Day 14 |
0.0 | 0.699 |
| SECONDARY Resolution of Ecchymosis as Assessed by Investigators |
0; 0; 2; 31; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Resolution of Edema as Assessed by Investigators. |
3; 0; 0; 29; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Total Volume of Drainage on Each Side of the Face |
16; 5 | 0.0010 sig |
| SECONDARY Participants With Hematoma/Seroma |
2; 0; 1; 0; 2; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Participants With Hematoma/Seroma During the Study |
0; 6; 0; 27 | 0.014 sig |
| SECONDARY Differences From Day 0 in Two-Point Discrimination Tests Days 3, 7, 10, 14 |
7; 7; 5; 6; 5; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Differences in Subjects' Assessments of Pain for Each Side of Face (SoC and FS VH S/D 4) |
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Differences in Subjects' Assessments of Numbness for Each Side of Face (SoC and FS VH S/D 4) |
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Participants' Assessment of Side of Face Preference (SoC and FS VH S/D 4) |
5; 12; 16; 1; 20; 12 | — |
Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fibrin sealant with 4 IU/mL thrombin, vapor heated, solvent detergent treated (FS VH S/D 4) when used to reduce early postoperative bruising in participants undergoing a rhytidectomy (face-lift).
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Subjects planned for facial rhytidectomy
- Subjects who read, understand and sign the written informed consent
- Healthy female or male subjects as determined by the investigator using standard pre-operative assessments to include laboratory tests and ECG
- Subjects 18-75 years old, inclusively
- Subjects who are able and willing to comply with the protocol requirements
- Female subjects of childbearing potential with a negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 72 hours of surgery
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Subjects who have undergone previous face-lift surgery
- Subjects undergoing abbreviated face-lift procedures such as deep plane procedures, minimal undermining procedures, thread lifts, and minimal access cranial suspension
- Subjects indicated for concurrent facial surgeries during the operation (e.g. forehead plasty, blepharoplasty, rhinoplasty, buccal fat removal, any filler injections including fat injections, lip augmentation, skin resurfacing procedures etc.)
- Subjects indicated for additional procedures during the same operation (e.g., liposuction, mastoplasty etc.)
- Subjects who had prior silicone injections to their face (Botox and/or Restylane are allowed)
- Subjects considered by the investigator to be smokers
- Subjects with ecchymosis and/or edema on the face on day 0, prior to surgery
- Subjects with known (documented) bleeding or coagulation disorders
- Subjects currently being treated with anti-coagulants
- Subjects treated with Aspirin in the last 7 days or use of other Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) within the last 7 days prior to surgery
- Subjects with vascular disorders, cardiovascular disease, and/or uncontrolled hypertension
- Subjects with diabetes mellitus
- Subjects with a history of Bell´s palsy
- Subjects with connective tissue disorders
- Subjects with documented history of pathologically or pharmacologically induced immune deficiency
- Subjects receiving systemic corticosteroid treatment for a chronic condition within 2 to 30 days prior to the surgery
- Subjects with a known sensitivity to fibrin sealants
- Subjects with a known psychiatric disorder (e.g., depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, anxiety, eating disorders, etc)
- Subjects who have participated in another clinical study within 30 days prior to this study
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00708071). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.