Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=132 Treatment

Study to Compare Survival for ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ Implants Following Immediate Loading in Extraction Sockets Versus Immediate Loading in Healed Ridges

Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00710944 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
132
Serious AEs
3.0%
Results posted
May 2014
Primary outcomePrimary: Implant Survival — 94.55; 98.28; 94.73 percentage of implants

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate survival for ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ implants following immediate loading in extraction sockets versus immediate loading in healed ridges. Patients in need of single standing implants replacing teeth in the maxilla within zone 15-25 will be included and followed for 5 years. Primary objective is implant survival rate at 12 months.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Implant Survival
94.55; 98.28; 94.73

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Provision of written informed consent
  • 18 years of age and over
  • A minimum of 20 stable intra occlusal contacts after planned restoration
  • In need of single standing implants replacing missing / extracted / avulsed teeth in the maxilla within zone 15 to 25

Exclusion Criteria

  • Untreated rampant caries and uncontrolled periodontal disease
  • Use of smoking tobacco at time of inclusion
  • History of pre-surgical bone augmentation, within 4 months, in the planned implant area
  • History of extraction without augmentation, within 3 months in the planned implant area
  • Absence of opposing dentition
  • Absence of adjacent (mesial and/or distal) natural tooth
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Known pregnancy at time of inclusion
  • Present alcohol or drug abuse
  • Any systemic or local disease or condition that would compromise post-operative healing and/or osseointegration
  • Need for systemic corticosteroids or any other medication that would compromise post-operative healing and/or osseointegration
  • Unable or unwilling to return for follow-up visits for a period of 5 years
  • Unrealistic esthetical demands
  • Unlikely to be able to comply with study procedures according to Investigators judgment
  • Already included in this study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00710944). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search