Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=214

Post-marketing Surveillance Study of Invasive Mycosis With Posaconazole (Study P04641)

Mycoses

Enrolled (actual)
214
Serious AEs
15.4%
Results posted
Sep 2009
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions. — 52; 30; 21; 1 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Posaconazole (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Primary completion
Jul 2008

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions.
52; 30; 21; 1

Summary

The purpose of this postmarketing surveillance study is to collect an extensive body of data in a large patient population in every day life to investigate the safety and efficacy of NOXAFIL® (posaconazole) in the treatment of invasive fungal disease.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Adult subjects with:

  • Invasive aspergillosis refractory to, or intolerant of, amphotericin B or itraconazole,
  • Fusariosis refractory to, or intolerant of, amphotericin B,
  • Chromoblastomycosis and mycetoma refractory to, or intolerant of, itraconazole,
  • Coccidiomycosis refractory to, or intolerant of, amphotericin B, itraconazole or fluconazole.
  • Subjects receiving remission-induction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) expected to result in prolonged neutropenia and who are at high risk for developing invasive fungal infections.
  • Hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) recipients who are undergoing high-dose immunosuppressive therapy for Graft-versus-host disease and who are at high risk for developing invasive fungal infections.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Comedication of the participant with ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, pimozide, halofantrine, or chinidine.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00726609). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search