Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=48 Single-blind Prevention

Povidone-iodine Against Sodium Hypochlorite as Skin Antiseptics

Healthy Volunteers
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00738543 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
48
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2010
Primary outcomePrimary: Bacterial Count of Skin Cultures for the 10% Povidone-iodine Period — 231 Colony-forming units per cm squared — p=<0.05

Summary

The investigators have few options for skin antisepsis. Alternatives for povidone-iodine, which is the most commonly used agent, are costly or ineffective. To have more options, this study is needed. The investigators want to know if there are difference between the use of 10% sodium hypochlorite or 10% povidone-iodine for skin antisepsis.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Bacterial Count of Skin Cultures for the 10% Povidone-iodine Period
231 <0.05 sig
PRIMARY
Bacterial Colony Forming Units for the 10% Sodium Hypochlorite Period
192 <0.05 sig
PRIMARY
Bacterial Colony Forming Units for the Control Period
1500
SECONDARY
Presence of Skin Reactions for the 10% Povidone-iodine Period
SECONDARY
Presence af Allergy or Skin Reaction for the 10% Sodium Hypochlorite Period

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Healthy adult volunteers.

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of skin allergies or atopy, as well as reactions to soaps, iodine, chlorine, or latex
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00738543). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search