Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=26 Randomized Double-blind

Evaluation of Contact Lenses and Conjunctival Staining in Normal Patients

Conjunctival Staining

Enrolled (actual)
26
Serious AEs
1.5%
Results posted
Nov 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Circumlimbal Conjunctival Staining Score — 6.39; 5.55; 5.68 Units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Complete Easy Rub (Device); ReNu MultiPlus (Device); Clear Care (Device); Contact lenses (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Alcon Research
Primary completion
Mar 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Circumlimbal Conjunctival Staining Score
6.39; 5.55; 5.68
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Dispense (Day 0) in Lens Base Curve at 1 Week
-0.25; -0.27; -0.25
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Dispense (Day 0) in Lens Diameter at 1 Week
0.15; 0.13; 0.14

Summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate contact lens fit, lens parameters, and conjunctival staining in a sample of subjects with various contact lens/solution combinations.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Successfully wearing hydrogel and/or silicone hydrogel contact lenses;
  • Read, sign, and date informed consent/HIPAA document;
  • Vision correctable to 20/30 (Snellen) or better in each eye at distance with habitual spectacles;
  • Willing and able to discontinue contact lens wear when requested during the study;
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Evidence or history of ocular disease or pathology;
  • One functional eye or a monofit lens;
  • Use of concomitant topical ocular prescription or over-the-counter ocular medications;
  • History of seasonal allergies with significant ocular side effects which may have an adverse impact on contact lens wear;
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00799422). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search