N/A
Completed N=49
A Comparison of the Infant Truview EVO2 Video Laryngoscope and the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Pediatric Patients
Laryngoscopy
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00803751 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
49
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Quality of Laryngeal View Obtained on Comarck Lehane Classification — 21; 13; 3; 5 Participants — p=0.17
Summary
This study is intended to examine the effectiveness of a new type of laryngoscope, the Truview EVO2, in an infant patient population. They device will be tested against the current clinical standard, the Macintosh laryngoscope, in patients undergoing surgery at our hospital in terms of ease of use, view obtained of the vocal cords, and ability to place an endotracheal tube.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Quality of Laryngeal View Obtained on Comarck Lehane Classification |
21; 13; 3; 5; 1; 4 | 0.17 |
| PRIMARY Number of Intubation Attempts |
17; 23; 4; 2; 2; 1 | 0.45 |
| PRIMARY Quality of Laryngeal View Obtained With 2nd Laryngoscopy |
10; 21; 7; 2; 9; 0 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Time Taken for Intubation |
25.23; 28.33 | 0.36 |
| SECONDARY POGO Score With 1st Laryngoscopy |
93.65; 73.81 | 0.002 sig |
| SECONDARY POGO Score With 2nd Laryngoscopy |
74.3; 98.0 | 0.0004 sig |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Age less than one year
- Requiring general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation
- Weight less than 10 kg
- ASA class 1-3
Exclusion Criteria
- Documented difficult airway
- Facial deformities
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00803751). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.