Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=13 Randomized Quadruple-blind Diagnostic

Assessment of the Effect of Botulinum Toxin in Extensor Digitorum Brevis Via Strain Gauge and Nerve Conduction Studies

Muscle Strength · Botulinum Toxins, Type A

Enrolled (actual)
13
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Measured Force (Change From Baseline) (Using Strain Gauges) of Dorsiflexion of Digits 2 and 3 ("Force of EDB") After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB — 7.63; 5.16; 10.43; 7.85 kg — p=0.61

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Botulinum Toxin, Type A (Drug); Saline (Drug)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Loma Linda University
Primary completion
Mar 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Measured Force (Change From Baseline) (Using Strain Gauges) of Dorsiflexion of Digits 2 and 3 ("Force of EDB") After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB
7.63; 5.16; 10.43; 7.85; 4.28; 12.22 0.61
SECONDARY
Stability of Baseline Measurements of Force
7.78; 4.83; 11.15; 7.58; 5.28; 9.82 0.636
SECONDARY
Difference in Force From Day 14 to Day 21
4.57; -4.81; 22.66; 27.01; -19.58; 15.15 0.995
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Effects to onabotulinumtoxinA (Botulinum Type A Neurotoxin)
0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Correlation in Percent Change of the CMAP (With Standard Reference Electrode Location) From EDB After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB vs. Percent Change Surface Electromyography (as Measured by Root Mean Squared With 1000 ms Window).
-53.81; -42.43; -63.78; -52.35; -48.38; -39.76 0.0374 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change of the Surface Electromyogram (SEMG) MRV-500 From EDB After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB.
-40.4; -44.4; -4.1; -50.8; -52.2; 0.7
SECONDARY
Correlation in Percent Change of the CMAP (With Standard Reference Electrode Location) From EDB After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB vs. Percent Change Surface Electromyography (as Measured by Root Mean Squared With 500 ms Window).
-53.81; -42.09; -63.78; -51.94; -48.38; -40.67 0.0374 sig
SECONDARY
Correlation in Percent Change of the CMAP (With Standard Reference Electrode Location) From EDB After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB vs. Percent Change Surface Electromyography (as Measured by Root Mean Squared With 200 ms Window).
-53.81; -39.89; -63.78; -51.75; -48.38; -39.90 0.0374 sig
SECONDARY
Correlation in Percent Change of the CMAP (With Standard Reference Electrode Location) From EDB After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB vs. Percent Change Surface Electromyography (as Measured by Mean Rectified Voltage With 1000 ms Window).
-53.81; -40.92; -63.78; -51.03; -48.38; -37.86 0.0374 sig
SECONDARY
Correlation in Percent Change of the CMAP (With Standard Reference Electrode Location) From EDB After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB vs. Percent Change Surface Electromyography (as Measured by Mean Rectified Voltage With 500 ms Window).
-53.81; -40.44; -63.78; -50.72; -48.38; -39.22 0.0374 sig
SECONDARY
Correlation in Percent Change of the CMAP (With Standard Reference Electrode Location) From EDB After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB vs. Percent Change Surface Electromyography (as Measured by Mean Rectified Voltage With 200 ms Window).
-53.81; -37.35; -63.78; -49.49; -48.38; -38.44 0.0374 sig
SECONDARY
Correlation in Percent Change of the CMAP (With "Inactive" Reference Electrode Location) From EDB After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB vs. Percent Change Surface Electromyography (as Measured by Root Mean Squared With 1000 ms Window).
-67.37; -42.43; -74.00; -52.35; -52.40; -39.76 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Correlation in Percent Change of the CMAP (With "Inactive" Reference Electrode Location) From EDB After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB vs. Percent Change Surface Electromyography (as Measured by Root Mean Squared With 500 ms Window).
-67.37; -42.09; -74.00; -51.94; -52.40; -40.67 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Correlation in Percent Change of the CMAP (With "Inactive" Reference Electrode Location) From EDB After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB vs. Percent Change Surface Electromyography (as Measured by Root Mean Squared With 200 ms Window).
-67.37; -39.89; -74.00; -51.75; -52.40; -39.90 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Correlation in Percent Change of the CMAP (With "Inactive" Reference Electrode Location) From EDB After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB vs. Percent Change Surface Electromyography (as Measured by Mean Rectified Voltage With 1000 ms Window).
-67.37; -40.92; -74.00; -51.03; -52.40; -37.86 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Correlation in Percent Change of the CMAP (With "Inactive" Reference Electrode Location) From EDB After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB vs. Percent Change Surface Electromyography (as Measured by Mean Rectified Voltage With 500 ms Window).
-67.37; -40.44; -74.00; -50.72; -52.40; -39.22 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Correlation in Percent Change of the CMAP (With "Inactive" Reference Electrode Location) From EDB After vs. Before Botulinum Toxin Injection Into EDB vs. Percent Change Surface Electromyography (as Measured by Mean Rectified Voltage With 200 ms Window).
67.37; -37.35; -74.00; -49.49; -52.40; -38.44 <0.0001 sig

Summary

The purpose of this feasibility study is to determine if temporary weakness of a small foot muscle caused by local injection of botulinum toxin into that muscle can be measured with a strain gauge in addition to the previously known valid measurements via nerve conduction studies and surface electromyogram.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Normal, healthy, male or female subjects, 18 to 54 years of age.
  • Written informed consent has been obtained.
  • Females with child-bearing potential have a negative urine pregnancy test and agree to use a reliable form of contraception during the study.
  • Ability to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits.
  • Written authorization for Use and Release of Health and Research Study Information has been obtained.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Abnormality by focused history and examination including the presence of foot deformity.
  • Abnormal (as determined by the investigator) screening nerve conduction studies of the lower limbs.
  • Identification of anomalous innervation of right EDB via screening nerve conduction studies.
  • The subject having a foot which does not adequately fit in the modified ankle-foot orthosis used with the strain gauge.
  • The subject having a foot in which anatomic bone landmarks cannot be adequately identified.
  • Body mass index (BMI) greater than 30.
  • History of significant (as determined by the investigator) lower limb injury or lower limb surgery
  • Any uncontrolled clinically significant medical condition.
  • Known allergy or sensitivity to any of the components in the study medication.
  • Females with a positive pregnancy test, or who are breast-feeding, planning a pregnancy during the study, who think that they may be pregnant at the start of the study, or females of childbearing potential who are unable or unwilling to use a reliable form of contraception during the study.
  • Concurrent participation in another investigational drug or device study or participation within 3 months prior to study.
  • Treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype prior to enrollment in study or prior clinical botulism.
  • Any medical condition that may put the subject at increased risk with exposure to BOTOX including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other disorder that might interfere with neuromuscular function.
  • Evidence of alcohol abuse, drug abuse, or other relevant neuropsychiatric condition.
  • Infection or skin disorder at an anticipated injection site.
  • Any condition or situation that, in the investigator's opinion, may put the subject at significant risk, confound the study results (e.g. variable strength on serial testing during screening examination; or foot, toe, or ankle pain that may limit full participation in muscle strength testing), or interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00822523). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search