Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=254 Randomized Treatment

A Study to Determine the Efficacy of Lenalidomide Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)

Mantle Cell Lymphoma · Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell

Enrolled (actual)
254
Serious AEs
38.8%
Results posted
Sep 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee (IRC) Central Review — 37.6; 22.7 weeks — p=0.012

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Lenalidomide (Drug); Investigators choice single agent (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Celgene
Primary completion
Jun 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee (IRC) Central Review
37.6; 22.7 0.012 sig
PRIMARY
Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival by Investigator's Assessment at the Final Analysis
37.3; 23.6 0.003 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the IRC Central Review
40.0; 10.7 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis
45.9; 22.6 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response (DOR) According to the IRC Central Review
69.6; 45.1 0.421
SECONDARY
Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis
70.1; 91.7 0.875
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response, Unconfirmed Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease According to the IRC Central Review
69.4; 63.1 0.313
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response, Unconfirmed Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease at the Final Analysis
70.0; 65.5 0.465
SECONDARY
Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression According to the IRC Central Review
39.3; 24.7 0.005 sig
SECONDARY
Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis
39.3; 24.7 0.003 sig
SECONDARY
Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) as Assessed by the Investigator
24.4; 17.9 0.046 sig
SECONDARY
Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Treatment Failure as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis
24.4; 17.9 0.095
SECONDARY
Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to First Response (TTFR) According to the IRC Central Review
18.7; NA <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to First Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis
23.9; 40.0 <0.004 sig
SECONDARY
Kaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival (OS) According to the IRC Central Review
121.0; 91.7 0.519
SECONDARY
Kaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis
120.6; 91.7 0.558
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
159; 69; 126; 49; 56; 29
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain
71.8; 78.9; -0.5; -3.7; 1.6; -2.1
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
3.4; -1.8
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Domain
71.5; 73.9; -4.8; 3.5; 1.4; -6.4
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
3.1; 5.0
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Domain
84.6; 83.6; 0.0; -2.3; -1.9; 1.3
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
3.2; 2.9
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Domain
74.9; 78.4; -1.0; -1.2; 1.6; -4.5
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
5.1; 3.8
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain
40.2; 39.2; 0.1; 2.1; -3.2; 3.4
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
-4.9; -2.9
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain
22.6; 13.7; -2.2; -1.2; -0.2; -2.6
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
-5.8; -3.5
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea / Vomiting Domain
4.9; 3.8; 2.5; 0.4; 2.6; 5.8
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea and Vomiting Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
-2.3; -0.6
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation
12.5; 8.6; 6.3; -0.8; 4.2; 1.3
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
-0.3; -3.5
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea
15.7; 12.6; -3.5; -3.1; -4.2; 1.3
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
-7.2; -5.8
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Domain
29.4; 25.7; -7.6; -4.7; -5.2; -6.4
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
-12.8; -7.6
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
26.5; 21.2; -1.6; -0.8; -1.4; 0.0
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
-7.3; -5.8
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
18.1; 16.2; 2.5; -0.8; 1.9; 5.1
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
-4.8; -4.1
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
19.5; 10.8; -7.0; -0.8; -7.0; -3.8
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
-10.9; -2.3
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain
59.0; 58.4; -3.4; 2.3; -0.7; 3.2
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
4.6; 5.6
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain
73.7; 78.5; 3.4; 1.3; 3.6; 1.3
SECONDARY
Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit
6.9; 3.7

Summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide versus investigator choice in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Biopsy proven mantle cell lymphoma
  • Patients who are refractory to their regimen or have relapsed once, twice or up to three times and who have documented progressive disease
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0,1, or 2
  • Willing to follow pregnancy precaution

Exclusion Criteria

  • Any of the following laboratory abnormalities
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) 3.0 x upper limit or normal (ULN), except patients with documented liver involvement by lymphoma
  • Serum total bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN, except in case of Gilbert's Syndrome and documented liver involvement by lymphoma.
  • Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula) of < 30 mL/min
  • History of active central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma within the previous 3 months
  • Subjects not willing to take deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis
  • Known seropositive for or active viral infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV). Patients who are sero-positive because of hepatitis B virus vaccine are eligible
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00875667). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search