Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=451 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) or Placebo in Combination With Platinum-Based Therapy as First Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00883779 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
451
Serious AEs
32.6%
Results posted
Dec 2015
Primary outcomePrimary: Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) Time — 6.0; 7.6 months — p=<0.0001

Summary

This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of sequential treatment with Tarceva or placebo, plus platinum-based therapy, as first line treatment in patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. Patients will be randomized to receive gemcitabine (1250mg/m2 iv) on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin (75mg/m2) or carboplatin (5xAUC)on day 1, followed by Tarceva 150mg/day or placebo from day 15 to day 28 of each 4 week cycle for a total of 6 cycles,then followed by Tarceva or placebo monotherapy.The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) Time
6.0; 7.6 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Alive and Free From Disease Progression
6.2; 22.6
SECONDARY
Median PFS Time Based on Different Subgroups
6.5; 8.2; 5.8; 5.7; 6.6; 10.9 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Median Overall Survival (OS) Time-Overall and Among Different Subgroups
15.2; 18.2; 15.8; 20.9; 12.4; 10.3 =0.1213
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Alive at the End of Study-Overall and Among Different Subgroups
13.3; 15.9; 14.9; 19.5; 8.8; 3.8
SECONDARY
Non-Progression Rate: Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Best Overall Response of Either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) for At Least 16 Weeks
64.4; 67.3 =0.5289
SECONDARY
Objective Response Rate: Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Best Overall Response of CR or PR
17.8; 42.9 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Duration of Response
5.6; 10.3 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Time to Progression
6.5; 7.9 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Progression Assessed Using the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS)
72.4; 66.4
SECONDARY
Time to Symptomatic Progression
6.6; 7.2 =0.0364 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Deterioration in Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Using FACT-L Version 4.0
75.6; 65.9
SECONDARY
Time to Deterioration in TOI Using FACT-L Version 4.0
5.6; 6.3 =0.0181 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Deterioration in Quality of Life (QOL) Using FACT-L Version 4.0
79.6; 70.4
SECONDARY
Time to Deterioration in QOL Using FACT-L Version 4.0
4.5; 5.6 =0.0035 sig
SECONDARY
Median Follow-up Time During the Study
50.3; 50.2 0.9130

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • adult patients, >=18 years of age;
  • advanced (stage IIIB/IV)non-small cell lung cancer;
  • measurable disease;
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0 or 1.

Exclusion Criteria

  • prior exposure to agents directed at the HER axis;
  • prior chemotherapy or systemic anti-tumor therapy after advanced disease;
  • unstable systemic disease;
  • any other malignancy within last 5 years, except cured basal cell cancer of skin or cured cancer in situ of cervix;
  • brain metastasis or spinal cord compression.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00883779). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search