Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=132 Randomized Treatment

SNaP Wound Care System Versus Traditional NPWT Device for Treatment of Chronic Wounds

Ulcers · Wounds

Enrolled (actual)
132
Serious AEs
1.5%
Results posted
Oct 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Percent Change in Wound Area — -85.7; -94 percentage of baseline wound area

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Traditional NPWT System (Device); SNaP Wound Care System (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
3M
Primary completion
Mar 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percent Change in Wound Area
-85.7; -94

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) device called the SNaP device compared to a traditional NPWT device for the treatment of lower extremity diabetic and venous ulcer wounds.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject has Venous Ulcer or Diabetic Ulcer with a surface area 30 days despite appropriate wound care
  • Subject has adequate blood perfusion (Defined as either transcutaneous oxygen measurements of the dorsum of the foot >30 mmHg or 0.7 12%)
  • Subject has end stage renal disease requiring dialysis
  • Subject is undergoing active chemotherapy treatment that inhibits wound healing
  • Subject has had previous treatment with NPWT device, growth factors, hyperbaric oxygen, or bioengineered tissue product within 30 days of enrollment
  • Subject has a >30% wound surface area reduction in size at 1 week after screening visit
  • Subject has any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the subject inappropriate to take part in this study
  • Subject is unwilling or unable to comply with protocol requirements
  • Subject is pregnant
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00951080). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search