Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=177 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Tranexamic Acid (TXA) Versus Epsilon Aminocaproic Acid (EACA) Versus Placebo for Spine Surgery

Scoliosis

Enrolled (actual)
177
Serious AEs
1.7%
Results posted
Dec 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Total Blood Loss Over Course of Stay (Intraoperative and Postoperatively Until Discharge) — 1775; 2116; 1531 ml

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Tranexamic Acid (Drug); Normal Saline (Drug); Epsilon aminocaproic acid (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 10+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
NYU Langone Health
Primary completion
Sep 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Total Blood Loss Over Course of Stay (Intraoperative and Postoperatively Until Discharge)
1775; 2116; 1531
SECONDARY
Total Units of Autologous and Allogenic Transfusion (Both Intraoperatively and Postoperatively Until Discharge)
SECONDARY
Length of Hospital Stay From Admission Until Patient Discharge

Summary

Tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) have been reported to reduce blood loss in the cardiac surgery literature but they have not been reported in use head-to-head in the orthopedic surgery literature. In a randomized, double-blind, prospective study we believe that TXA will be more effective than both EACA and placebo at reducing blood loss for corrective spinal surgery.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Undergoing thoracic and/or lumbar surgery for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, neuromuscular scoliosis, or adult deformity for correction of condition via posterior spinal fusion of 6 levels or greater.

Exclusion Criteria

  • No renal dysfunction identified by elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (CR) or BUN to CR ratio greater than 20:1
  • Hold religious and/or other beliefs limiting blood transfusion
  • Currently use anti-coagulant medication or have past medical history leading to abnormal coagulation profile pre-operatively
  • Significant past medical history preventing the use of TXA or EACA described in the protocol
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00958581). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search