Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=33 Randomized Other

A Comparison of Different Ventilation Strategies in Children Using the Proseal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway

Intraoperative Ventilation

Enrolled (actual)
33
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Differences in End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Compared Between the Spontaneous Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation Groups. — 55.2; 47 mmHg — p=.0051

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Spontaneous ventilation (Procedure); Pressure support Ventilation (Device); Pressure control ventilation (Device)
Age
Pediatric · 0+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Primary completion
Oct 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Differences in End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Compared Between the Spontaneous Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation Groups.
55.2; 47 .0051 sig
PRIMARY
Differences Tidal Volume Compared Between the Spontaneous Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation Groups.
4.0; 7.6 .0001 sig
PRIMARY
Mean Values of ETCO2 in SV and PCV Groups
55.2; 43.1
PRIMARY
Mean Tidal Volume Values Compared Between SV and PCV Groups
4.0; 7.6
PRIMARY
Mean Values of ETCO2 Between the PSV and PCV Groups
47.0; 43.1
PRIMARY
Mean Values of Tidal Volume Between the PSV and PCV Groups
7.6; 7.6
SECONDARY
Differences in Respiratory Rates Between Spontaneous Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation Groups.
28.1; 14.2 .0001 sig
SECONDARY
Mean Values of Respiratory Rate Compared Between the Spontaneous Ventilation and Pressure Control Ventilation Groups.
28.1; 21.2
SECONDARY
Mean Values of Respiratory Rate Compared Between Pressure Support Ventilation and Pressure Control Ventilation Groups.
14.2; 21.2

Summary

The purpose of this research study is to compare difference between breathing by oneself or with the partial help from an anesthesia machine in children under general anesthesia.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • ASA physical classification 1, 2 (Healthy or relatively healthy children)
  • Subjects scheduled for outpatient surgical procedures.
  • Surgical procedure anticipated to be < 90 minutes
  • Subject weight of ≤ 20 kg (44 lbs)
  • Subject age of 12 months to 5 years (inclusive)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inpatient
  • ASA physical classification of 3, 4 or E (sick children)
  • Risk of aspiration
  • Subjects with malignant hyperthermia or family history of malignant hyperthermia
  • Subjects with tracheostomies
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00966433). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search