Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=52 Randomized Treatment

Tacrolimus Versus Prednisolone for the Treatment of Minimal Change Disease

Minimal Change Disease

Enrolled (actual)
52
Serious AEs
13.5%
Results posted
May 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission From Nephrotic Syndrome at 8 Weeks — 21; 17 Participants — p=0.12

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
tacrolimus (Drug); prednisolone (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Primary completion
Oct 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission From Nephrotic Syndrome at 8 Weeks
21; 17 0.12
SECONDARY
Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete Remission From Nephrotic Syndrome at 16 and 26 Weeks
23; 19; 23; 22
SECONDARY
Percentage of Patients Achieving Remission Who Then Relapse
17; 16
SECONDARY
Number of Serious Adverse Events
4; 3
SECONDARY
Change in Baseline Glomerular Filtration Rate

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of tacrolimus (prograf) versus prednisolone for the treatment of nephrotic syndrome secondary to minimal change disease.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with nephrotic syndrome (hypoalbuminaemia and protein creatinine ratio (PCR) > 100units), secondary to minimal change disease.
  • Age over 18.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Hepatitis B, hepatitis C or HIV infection.
  • Untreated infection.
  • Females who are pregnant, breast feeding, or at risk of pregnancy and not using a medically acceptable form of contraception.
  • Patients who have been treated with immunosuppression over the last 18 months.
  • Patients who have had more than 3 relapses of nephrotic syndrome within 5 years.
  • Any condition judged by the investigator that would cause the study to be detrimental to the patient.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00982072). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search