Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=265 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Performance Evaluation of Contact Lenses Among a Population of Adapted Contact Lens Wearers

Vision Disorders

Enrolled (actual)
265
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Distance Visual Acuity (VA) Between Test and Control Lenses Worse Than 20/40. — 2; 0 eyes

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
PureVision Multi-Focal contact lenses (Device); SofLens59 contact lens (Device)
Age
Adult · 30+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Primary completion
Nov 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Distance Visual Acuity (VA) Between Test and Control Lenses Worse Than 20/40.
2; 0
SECONDARY
Subjective Ratings of Eye Strain
9.9; 9.0

Summary

This study is being conducted to evaluate Bausch & Lomb PureVision Multi-Focal contact lenses compared to the Bausch & Lomb SofLens59 contact lens when worn by adapted soft contact lens wearers on a daily wear basis.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects must have clear central corneas and be free of any anterior segment disorders.
  • Subjects must be adapted soft contact lens wearers and agree to wear the study lenses on a daily wear basis for at least eight hours a day for approximately two weeks.
  • Subjects must wear a lens in each eye and each lens must be of the same manufacture and brand.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects participating in any drug or device clinical investigation within two weeks prior to entry into this study and/or during the period of study participation.
  • Subjects with any systemic disease affecting ocular health
  • Subjects with an active ocular disease or using any ocular medication.
  • Subjects who have had any corneal surgery (eg, refractive surgery).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00985231). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search