Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=189 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Study Of Celecoxib In Healthy Subjects

Healthy Volunteers

Enrolled (actual)
189
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Incidence of Gastroduodenal Ulcers — 1.4; 27.6; 2.7 Percent — p=<0.0001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Celecoxib (Drug); Loxoprofen (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 40+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Primary completion
Apr 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Incidence of Gastroduodenal Ulcers
1.4; 27.6; 2.7 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Incidence of Any Gastric, and Duodenal Ulcers
0; 25.0; 2.7; 1.4; 5.3; 0
SECONDARY
Incidence of Any Gastroduodenal, Gastric, and Duodenal Ulcers and/or Erosions
36.5; 53.9; 24.3; 35.1; 53.9; 24.3
SECONDARY
Post-treatment Gastroduodenal Endoscopic Scores (According to Mucosal Grading Scale)
38; 33; 22; 8; 2; 6
SECONDARY
Number of Gastroduodenal Ulcers in Each Subject
73; 55; 36; 1; 10; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Gastroduodenal Erosions in Each Subject
47; 41; 29; 14; 13; 5
SECONDARY
Incidence of Treatment-emergent, All-causality GI Body System Adverse Events
24.3; 47.4; 16.2

Summary

A study to confirm the superiority of celecoxib 100 mg BID to loxoprofen 60 mg TID in the incidence of gastroduodenal endoscopic ulcers after 2 weeks treatment.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Healthy Volunteers

Exclusion Criteria

  • Endoscopic evidence of ulceration, erosion or active bleeding etc. in the esophagus, stomach, pylorus and/or duodenum prior to treatment endoscopy
  • A history of gastrointestinal ulcer
  • Any use of celecoxib, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (including aspirin), anti-ulcer medication, antacids, systemic steroids or antibiotics within four weeks prior to the first dose of study medication
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00994461). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search