Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=38 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Study of Epidural Steroid Injection (ESI) Versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression (Mild®) in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Central Canal Stenosis

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Enrolled (actual)
38
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Change in VAS — 2.52; 0.06 units on a scale — p=<0.05

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
MILD® (Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression) (Device); Epidural Steroid Injection (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Coastal Orthopedics & Sports Medicine
Primary completion
Jun 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Change in VAS
2.19; 1.00 <0.05 sig
PRIMARY
Mean Change in ODI
16.13; 6.17 <0.05 sig
PRIMARY
Mean Change in VAS
2.19; 1.00 <0.05 sig
PRIMARY
Mean Change in ODI
16.13; 6.17 <0.05 sig

Summary

This is a single-center, randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical study to assess the clinical application and outcomes with MILD® devices versus epidural steroid injection in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe central canal spinal stenosis.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) primarily caused by dorsal element hypertrophy.
  • Prior failure of conservative therapy and ODI Score >20%.
  • Radiologic evidence of LSS (L3-L5), Ligamentum flavum >2.5mm, confirmed by pre-op MRI and/or CT.
  • Central canal cross sectional area ≤ 100 square mm.
  • Anterior listhesis ≤ 5.0mm.
  • Able to walk at least 10 feet unaided before being limited by pain.
  • Available to complete 26 weeks of follow-up.
  • A signed Informed Consent Form is obtained from the patient.
  • Adults at least 18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Prior surgery at intended treatment level.
  • History of recent spinal fractures with concurrent pain symptoms.
  • Disabling back or leg pain from causes other than LSS (e.g. acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, or vascular claudication symptoms, etc.)
  • Significant / symptomatic disc protrusion or osteophyte formation.
  • Excessive / symptomatic facet hypertrophy.
  • Bleeding disorders and/or current use of anti-coagulants.
  • Use of ASA and/or NSAID within 5 days of treatment.
  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding.
  • Epidural steroids previously administered (not ESI naive)
  • Wound healing pathologies deemed to compromise outcomes, including: diabetes, excessive smoking history, cancer, connective tissue diseases, recent spine radiation and severe COPD.
  • Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent.
  • Inability of the patient to lie prone for any reason with anesthesia support (e.g. COPD, obesity, etc.).
  • On Workman's Compensation or considering litigation associated with back pain.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00995371). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search