Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=103 Treatment

Safety and Efficacy of Juvederm® VOLUMA™ for Correction of Mid-face Volume Deficiency

Mid-face Volume Deficiency

Enrolled (actual)
103
Serious AEs
0.5%
Results posted
Feb 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Subject's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Week 4 — 97.06 percentage of participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel (Device)
Age
Adult · 30+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Allergan
Primary completion
Apr 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Subject's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Week 4
97.06
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Subject's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Week 8
97.98
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Physician's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Week 4
100
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Physician's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Week 8
100
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants a ≥1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Physician's Mid-face Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) at Week 4
92.23
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Physician's Mid-face Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) at Week 8
95.96
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 MFVDS Scores at Week 52
40.8
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 MFVDS Scores at Week 78
30.1
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 MFVDS Scores at Week 104
38.8
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 Subject's GAIS Scores at Week 52
41.7
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 Subject's GAIS Scores at Week 78
36.9
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 Subject's GAIS Scores at Week 104
36.9
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 Physician's GAIS Scores at Week 52
32.0
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 Physician's GAIS Scores at Week 78
28.2
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 Physician's GAIS Scores at Week 104
29.1
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Investigator's Wrinkle Assessment Scale (WAS)
35.92; 45.45; 36.76; 42.68; 48.61; 34.95
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the MFVDS Score
3.45; 1.58; 2.03; 1.68; 1.44; 1.72
SECONDARY
Physician Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (GAIS)
1.35; 1.76; 1.13; 0.85; 1.14
SECONDARY
Subject's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (GAIS)
1.31; 1.55; 1.01; 0.79; 0.97
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Subject's Self-Perception of Age (SPA)
-3.03; -3.74; -3.15; -2.88; -3.85
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied With the Treatment
66.7; 24.2

Summary

This is a prospective, open-label experience study to be conducted at 6 clinical sites in Australia, with the objective to collect efficacy and safety information for Juvederm® VOLUMA™ when used for volumising the mid-face and cheek area.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects with mild to severe mid-face and cheek volume deficit due to age-related changes, who are likely to improve by at least 2 grades following treatment with the study compound, based on a study-specific scale, as assessed by the study physician

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects who have a pre-existing medical condition or who have received any treatments or procedures which may impact on the assessment of the effects of the study compound.
  • Subjects with a history of allergies or other side effects to dermal fillers, lidocaine, hyaluronic acid or other component of the study compound.
  • Subjects were are pregnant or breast-feeding or who are of child-bearing potential and who are not prepared to practice an adequate form of contraception during the course of the study
  • Subjects with a history of alcoholism or drug abuse or dependence
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01029535). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search