N/A
N=103
Safety and Efficacy of Juvederm® VOLUMA™ for Correction of Mid-face Volume Deficiency
Mid-face Volume Deficiency
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01029535 ↗Enrolled (actual)
103
Serious AEs
0.5%
Results posted
Feb 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Subject's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Week 4 — 97.06 percentage of participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel (Device)
- Age
- Adult · 30+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Allergan
- Primary completion
- Apr 2011
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Subject's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Week 4 |
97.06 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Subject's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Week 8 |
97.98 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Physician's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Week 4 |
100 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Physician's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Week 8 |
100 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants a ≥1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Physician's Mid-face Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) at Week 4 |
92.23 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Physician's Mid-face Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) at Week 8 |
95.96 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 MFVDS Scores at Week 52 |
40.8 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 MFVDS Scores at Week 78 |
30.1 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 MFVDS Scores at Week 104 |
38.8 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 Subject's GAIS Scores at Week 52 |
41.7 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 Subject's GAIS Scores at Week 78 |
36.9 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 Subject's GAIS Scores at Week 104 |
36.9 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 Physician's GAIS Scores at Week 52 |
32.0 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 Physician's GAIS Scores at Week 78 |
28.2 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Week 8 Physician's GAIS Scores at Week 104 |
29.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Investigator's Wrinkle Assessment Scale (WAS) |
35.92; 45.45; 36.76; 42.68; 48.61; 34.95 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in the MFVDS Score |
3.45; 1.58; 2.03; 1.68; 1.44; 1.72 | — |
| SECONDARY Physician Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (GAIS) |
1.35; 1.76; 1.13; 0.85; 1.14 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (GAIS) |
1.31; 1.55; 1.01; 0.79; 0.97 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in the Subject's Self-Perception of Age (SPA) |
-3.03; -3.74; -3.15; -2.88; -3.85 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied With the Treatment |
66.7; 24.2 | — |
Summary
This is a prospective, open-label experience study to be conducted at 6 clinical sites in Australia, with the objective to collect efficacy and safety information for Juvederm® VOLUMA™ when used for volumising the mid-face and cheek area.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Subjects with mild to severe mid-face and cheek volume deficit due to age-related changes, who are likely to improve by at least 2 grades following treatment with the study compound, based on a study-specific scale, as assessed by the study physician
Exclusion Criteria
- Subjects who have a pre-existing medical condition or who have received any treatments or procedures which may impact on the assessment of the effects of the study compound.
- Subjects with a history of allergies or other side effects to dermal fillers, lidocaine, hyaluronic acid or other component of the study compound.
- Subjects were are pregnant or breast-feeding or who are of child-bearing potential and who are not prepared to practice an adequate form of contraception during the course of the study
- Subjects with a history of alcoholism or drug abuse or dependence
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01029535). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.