Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=559 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Observation Versus Occlusion Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia

Exotropia

Enrolled (actual)
559
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Deterioration by 6 Months - Older Cohort — 10; 1; 7; 1 Participants — p=0.004

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
occlusion treatment (Device)
Age
Pediatric · 0+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Primary completion
Dec 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Deterioration by 6 Months - Older Cohort
10; 1; 7; 1; 1; 0 0.004 sig
PRIMARY
Deterioration by 3 Years - Older Cohort
25; 0
PRIMARY
Deterioration by 6 Months - Younger Cohort
4; 2; 2; 2; 2; 0 0.27
PRIMARY
Deterioration by 3 Years - Younger Cohort
24; 0
SECONDARY
Distance Stereoacuity - 3 Years
2.03; 0.14 <.001 sig
SECONDARY
Near Stereoacuity - 6 Months
1.84; 1.84; 0.00; 0.06 0.38
SECONDARY
Near Stereoacuity - 3 Years
1.7; 0.14 <.001 sig
SECONDARY
Exotropia Control at Distance - 6 Months
2.3; 2.0; 2.8; 2.3; 0.1; 0.3 0.09
SECONDARY
Exotropia Control at Distance - 3 Years
1.8; 2.2; 0.6; 0.2 <.001 sig
SECONDARY
Exotropia Control at Near - 6 Months
1.2; 0.9; 1.4; 1.1; -0.2; 0.1 0.013 sig
SECONDARY
Exotropia Control at Near - 3 Years
0.9; 1.0; 0.1; 0.1 0.42
SECONDARY
PACT Exodeviation at Distance - 6 Months
23.8; 22.2; 27.9; 24.9; -0.3; 1.4 0.012 sig
SECONDARY
PACT at Distance - 3 Years
21.0; 23.4; 2.2; 3.6 .002 sig
SECONDARY
PACT at Near - 6 Months
17.6; 15.4; 19.3; 17.0; 0.5; 1.5 0.11
SECONDARY
PACT at Near - 3 Years
17.0; 14.9; 0.4; 2.8 0.60

Summary

The present study is being conducted to assess the natural history of intermittent exotropia and to establish the effectiveness of occlusion in its treatment. Study Objectives: * To determine the effectiveness of occlusion for the treatment of intermittent exotropia among patients aged 3 to < 11 years who have baseline near stereoacuity of 400 arcsec or better by Preschool Randot stereotest * To determine the natural history of intermittent exotropia among patients aged 3 to < 11 years who have baseline near stereoacuity of 400 arcsec or better by Preschool Randot stereotest

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 12 months to < 11 years
  • Intermittent exotropia (manifest deviation) meeting all of the following criteria:
  • Intermittent exotropia at distance OR constant exotropia at distance and either intermittent exotropia or exophoria at near
  • Exodeviation at least 15PD at distance OR near measured by prism and alternate cover test (PACT)
  • Exodeviation at least 10PD at distance measured by PACT
  • No previous surgical or non-surgical treatment for IXT (other than refractive correction)
  • Visual acuity in the worse eye at least 0.3 logMAR (20/40 on ATS HOTV or 70 letters on E-ETDRS) for children ≥ 3 years of age
  • No interocular difference of visual acuity more than 0.2 logMAR (2 lines on ATS HOTV or 10 letters on E-ETDRS) for children ≥ 3 years of age
  • No hyperopia greater than +3.50 D spherical equivalent in either eye
  • No myopia greater than -6.00 D spherical equivalent in either eye
  • No prior strabismus, intraocular, or refractive surgery
  • No abnormality of the cornea, lens, or central retina
  • Investigator willing to observe the IXT untreated for 3 years unless specific criteria for deterioration are met

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pure phoria at both distance and near
  • Prior non-surgical treatment for IXT other than refractive correction (e.g., vergence therapy, occlusion, vision therapy/orthoptics, or deliberate over-minus with spectacles more than 0.50D)
  • Previous amblyopia treatment other than refractive correction within 1 year
  • Vision therapy/orthoptics for any reason within the last year
  • Interocular visual acuity difference more than 0.2 logMAR (2 lines on ATS HOTV for patients 3 to < 7 years old or 10 letters on E-ETDRS for patients ≥ 7 years old) (patients ≥ 3 years only) and/or investigator plans to initiate amblyopia treatment at this time.
  • Limitation of ocular rotations due to restrictive or paretic strabismus
  • Craniofacial malformations affecting the orbits
  • Ocular disorders which would reduce visual acuity (except refractive error)
  • Prior strabismus surgery or botulinum injection, intraocular surgery, or refractive surgery
  • Strabismus surgery planned
  • Known skin reactions to patch or bandage adhesives
  • Significant neurological impairment such as cerebral palsy. Patients with mild speech delays or common reading and/or learning disabilities are not excluded.
  • Investigator planning to change refractive correction at this time (if the patient is otherwise eligible, the investigator should consider prescribing refractive correction and bringing the patient back at a later time for enrollment)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01032330). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search