N/A
N=849
The Electronic Asthma Action Plan System for Implementation in Primary Care
Asthma
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01070095 ↗Enrolled (actual)
849
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Sep 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants to Whom an AAP (Asthma Action Plan) Was Delivered by the Clinician — 0; 79 Participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Electronic Asthma Action Plan System (Other)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 16+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Unity Health Toronto
- Primary completion
- Aug 2014
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Number of Participants to Whom an AAP (Asthma Action Plan) Was Delivered by the Clinician |
0; 79 | — |
| SECONDARY The Impact of the eAAPS on Patient-relevant Outcomes Including Hospitalisations, Emergency Room Visits, Unscheduled & Total Visits to the Doctor, Days Off Work/School, Nocturnal/Daytime Asthma Symptoms, Daytime Rescue Bronchodilator Use & Quality of Life. |
— | — |
| SECONDARY Asthma Control Assessment |
118; 523 | — |
| SECONDARY Medication Escalations |
106; 117 | — |
| SECONDARY Appropriate Medication Changes |
113; 85 | — |
| SECONDARY On Treatment Analysis |
81 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Practitioners Completing Feedback Questionnaires |
12 | — |
| SECONDARY Ratio of Rescue to Controller Medication Prescriptions |
1.15; 0.14 | — |
| SECONDARY Adherence Discussions |
219 | — |
| SECONDARY System Uptake |
174 | — |
Summary
Asthma is a common and potentially fatal chronic disease. An asthma action plan (AAP) is a written plan produced by a physician for a patient with asthma, to provide education and guidelines for self-management of worsening asthma symptoms. Studies have shown that AAPs effectively improve asthma control, but physicians fail to provide AAPs due to lack of time and adequate skills. Physicians also often fail to determine if their patients have good asthma control, and to adjust medications in response to patients' control level. The investigators propose to develop and test a computerized tool that will help physicians to determine if their patients' asthma is well controlled, advise them on medication changes required according to the current level of control, and automatically generate an electronic version of the AAP, all based on patient responses to a questionnaire. The investigators hope that this system will eliminate the barriers that physicians face in determining asthma control, adjusting medications, and delivering an AAP, and will increase the frequency with which physicians are able to achieve these goals in patients with asthma. The objectives of the study are to determine the impact of this system on asthma action plan delivery by primary care physicians, the frequency of checking control level, and the frequency and appropriateness of asthma medication changes (in accordance with control). We will also attempt to determine the impact of the system on hospitalisations, emergency room (ER) visits, unscheduled visits to the doctor, total visits to the doctor, days off work or school, nocturnal asthma symptoms, daytime asthma symptoms, daytime rescue puffer use, and quality of life, and to measure physicians' perceptions of and satisfaction with the system.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Eligible physicians will include all primary care physicians at the 4 sites.
Eligible patients will include:
- patients with asthma, as determined by a validated electronic chart record search algorithm for asthma and on an asthma medication [but not a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) medication] within 1 year;
- patients >/= 16 years of age who understand English
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnant patients will be excluded given that conventional AAP recommendations may not be appropriate in this population.
- Any patient deemed to have cognitive limitations or a life expectancy of < 1 year
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01070095). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.