Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=30 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Single Site, Masked, Randomized, Controlled Study to Assess Efficacy of Osurdex as Adjunct to Avastin Compared With Avastin Alone in the Treatment of Patients With Macular Edema Due to Central or Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Retinal Vein Occlusions

Enrolled (actual)
30
Serious AEs
23.3%
Results posted
Apr 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline Visual Acuity at 6 Months — 2.3; 0.1 ETDRS score

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Avastin (Drug); Osurdex (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Maturi, Raj K., M.D., P.C.
Primary completion
Oct 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline Visual Acuity at 6 Months
2.3; 0.1
SECONDARY
Number of Injections Needed
14; 11
SECONDARY
Change in Macular Thickness and Macular Volume
45.4; -55.6

Summary

Comparative study to see if treating with Osurdex in addition to Avastin in patients with retinal vein occlusions helps increased visual acuity outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • male or female age 18 years or older
  • Branch retinal vein occlusion or central retinal vein occlusion of less than one year duration
  • Best correct visual acuity of greater than 24 and less than 80
  • Presence of macular edema defined as OCT central subfield thickness of >250

Exclusion Criteria

  • intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in study eye within six weeks of baseline
  • intravitreal steroid treatment in the study eye within eight weeks of baseline visit
  • PRP in the study eye within 4 month of baseline visit
  • Active iris neovascularization in study eye
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Known history of IOP elevation in response to corticosteroid treatment that is not controlled on 2 glaucoma medications
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01085734). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search